Laserfiche WebLink
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> • <br /> improve progress toward closure if a chap e or addition of remediation technologies is warranted or if P P �' � g � <br /> system can be closed <br /> 9-3 Sampling and Analysis <br /> a To verify that cleanup criteria have been achieved,the sampling plan described in the SAP will be <br /> carred out The sampling is likely to be more exhaustive both spatially and analytically than that used <br /> during routine monitoring The DQOs will probably be more rigorous as at this stage the consequences of <br /> errors are more serious It will be important when deterimning cleanup confirmation or compliance with <br /> ARARs to use sampling techniques that are consistent with those used at system start-up,so that <br /> comparisons between the two sets of data are meaningful Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) <br /> samples, such as field duplicates,equipment blanks,trip blanks, and split samples sent to the USACE QA <br /> laboratory,will be an important component of the sampling program Adherence to standard operating <br /> procedures,including sample notation and chain-of-custody procedures,is critical at this juncture <br /> Table 3-4 lists the topics covered in a SAP <br /> b It is important to note that it is NOT appropriate to wait until sampling for"closure" to perform <br /> thorough sampling and analysis of key soil venting parameters In order to operate the system optimally,it <br /> is critical to frequently monitor parameters such as extracted concentration and flows from individual wells, <br /> in-situ soil gas concentrations from vadose zone piezometers,and water table fluctuations A more <br /> comprehensive list of routine sampling parameters is found in Chapters 7 and 8 In addition the RSE <br /> checklists describe a set of parameters that should be monitored periodically to ensure that the system is <br /> operating as intended By maintaining a good database of the "routine" operational data,the practitioner is <br /> unlikely to be surprised by the results of the sampling and analyses described in this chapter <br /> c Analytical Definitive fixed-laboratory analyses are usually required at this stage Use of standard <br /> analytical methods and reference materials to enhance comparability of data over time and across <br /> laboratories will make the comparison valid An example of a reference material might be a sample of <br /> floating product from a monitoring well in the case of remediation of a gasoline release An aliquot of this <br /> product would be analyzed every time a set of field samples was analyzed to indicate differences in <br /> analytical response Completion of remediation will be documented by attainment of agreed-upon <br /> contaminant concentrations using agreed-upon sampling and analysis methodologies <br /> 9-4. Typical Data Trends <br /> Usually the most concentrated exhaust stream treated by an SVE system is encountered at the beginning of <br /> remediation The typical data trend for vapor phase contaminant concentrations is steeply downward for <br /> two to three months,after which concentrations approach asymptotic levels This is graphically depicted <br /> for six example sites in Figure 9-1 Some systems are operated intermittently(pulsed)to periodically <br /> permit the soil system to equilibrate and introduce additional VOC into the soil air to maximize vapor <br /> phase concentrations This may make the air treatment system more efficient,particularly for catalytic <br /> combustion treatment systems(see paragraph 8-2) <br /> a If the data do not demonstrate an appreciable reduction in vapor phase contaminant concentrations <br /> over the first few months of operation,it is possible that NAPL is present and acting as a continuing source <br /> of VOC vapors <br /> • <br /> 9-3 <br />