My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008332
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> • b Several data trends are commonly encountered in monitoring contaminant concentrations in soil, <br /> soil gas,and vent gas Residual soil contamination(paragraph 2-3c(6))decreases with venting time,and <br /> distillation effects are apparent from preferential evaporation of more volatile compounds,leaving heavier <br /> compounds behind However, tracking residual contamination accurately requires analyzing a large <br /> number of samples because soil,being an unmixed medium,is heterogeneous Analysis of residual <br /> contamination is usually limited to before venting,to determine starting concentrations,and after the <br /> venting operation is complete,to confirm that treatment goals have been met (Analyses of residual <br /> contamination in soil samples are actually analyses of the residual plus aqueous plus vapor phase <br /> contaminants) <br /> c SVE shutdown should not be considered in isolation at sites with underlying contanunated ground <br /> water Concentrations of contaminants in ground water should also be monitored to determine the <br /> contribution of contaminants from the aqueous phase to the soil gas A site contaminated with up to <br /> 55 mg/kg of PCE in soil was subjected to SVE to achieve a cleanup goal of 1 mg/kg After 9 months,the <br /> PCE concentration in vent gas was less that 1 percent of its initial value Soil gas concentrations met <br /> shutdown criteria,but soil sample analyses showed PCE concentrations of up to 15 mg/kg It was found <br /> that groundwater was recontaminating the soil by capillary action and water table fluctuations Bulk fluid <br /> movement during a period when the water table rose and fell evidently accelerated the mass transfer <br /> process from the saturated zone to the unsaturated zone Solute was apparently transported up into the <br /> vadose zone during a water table rise,and then exposed to soil gas in the vadose zone following a drop in <br /> the water table and draining of soil near the capillary fringe Under stagnant water table conditions,by <br /> contrast,the mass transfer process would tend to be diffusion limited and therefore four orders of <br /> magnitude slower than during a period of bulk fluid movement A rough calculation showed that <br /> • groundwater could have contributed 270 kg of the more than 325 kg of PCE that were removed by the SVE <br /> system(Urban 1992) By performing extensive simulations using the multi-phase flow model,T2VOC, <br /> Williams at al (2000)have demonstrated a similar phenomenon at the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions <br /> Plant(TCAAP) <br /> d Air,being a mixed medium,is more economical than soil for monitoring the progress of SVE/BV <br /> operations Vent gas concentrations can provide a gauge of mass removal from the whole soil volume <br /> affected by the SVE/BV system,while soil gas monitoring can resolve spatial variation in vapor phase <br /> contaminant concentrations Monitoring of vapor phase compounds,including both VOCs and Oz,CO2 <br /> and methane in monitoring points will assist greatly in calibrating flow models and improving confidence <br /> in the results of the modeling Another parameter which may be measured is tracer gas concentration at <br /> monitoring points after injection of the gas into a specified point This permits estimation of flow velocities <br /> to assist in calibration of models and estimation of pore volume exchange rates across the site(USEPA, <br /> 1996) <br /> e BV is at times employed for treatment of soils contaminated with weathered fuels containing <br /> relatively heavy petroleum hydrocarbons In such applications,soil concentrations have been observed to <br /> decline moderately fast at first, then the degradation rates decline slowly over time Concurrent shutdown <br /> testing performed periodically indicated that oxygen uptake rates declined over time, signaling that most of <br /> the more biodegradable constituents had been consumed A risk-based approach to viewing such data <br /> might argue that if the remaining constituents are so low in solubility and volatility that they are no longer <br /> bioavailable under operating conditions that are known to favor biological activity,they may no longer <br /> present a risk,provided that direct contact exposure routes can be prevented through appropriate <br /> administrative or containment measures (Smith et a] 1995) <br /> i <br /> 9-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.