Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. <br /> PC: 1-16-86 <br /> VR-86-2 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that: <br /> 1. The Negative Declaration be approved; and <br /> 2 . The Variance request for parcel A only, be approved based on <br /> the findings noted and subject to the attached conditions. <br /> The Variance request for Parcels B and C be denied. <br /> FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PARCEL A <br /> 1 . There are special circumstances applicable to the property, <br /> including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, <br /> the strict application of the zoning regulation deprives the <br /> property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the <br /> vicinity and under identical zoning classification because <br /> the small, irregularly-shaped Parcel A is bounded by public <br /> roads on two sides and the Woodbridge Irrigation District <br /> Canal on the west which is an existing unique, physical con- <br /> dition not applicable to other properties in the area and <br /> zone. <br /> 2. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of <br /> special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon <br /> other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the prop- <br /> erty is situated because the property is already isolated <br /> and below zone minimum. <br /> 3 . The Variance will not authorize a use or activity which is <br /> not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation <br /> governing the parcel of property because granting the <br /> Variance for Parcel A would not authorize any uses incon- <br /> sistent with the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PARCELS B AND C <br /> 1 . There are no special circumstances applicable to the prop- <br /> erty, including size, shape, topography, location or surround- <br /> ings where the strict application of the zoning regulation <br /> deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other proper- <br /> ties in the vicinity under identical zoning classification <br /> because the area comprised of proposed Parcels B and C is <br /> consistent with the zoning and General Plan designation. <br /> 2 . The granting of the Variancoe will constitute a grant of spe- <br /> cial privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other <br /> properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is <br /> situated because the combined area of Parcels B and C meet <br />