Laserfiche WebLink
uuurfns oesr�nsmsuuuns <br /> Following the Phase II investigation, monitor wells MW-2 and MW-3 went dry due to a drop <br /> in the regional groundwater table. Monitor well MW-3 was abandoned and both wells were <br />' replaced with deeper wells (MW-2A and MW-3A) in 1995 during the Phase III investigation. <br /> Soil samples were collected from the bore holes of the new monitor wells. During the <br /> installation of monitor well MW-2A limited free phase petroleum hydrocarbons were observed <br /> as beads on soil and sheen at the groundwater table Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected <br /> in soil or groundwater samples collected from monitor well MW-3A <br />' A Phase W investigation was conducted in August 1996 to collect additional soil contaminant <br /> concentration data in the vicinity of MW-2A and to collect up gradient groundwater analytical <br /> data As part of the planning of the Phase IV investigation one year of quarterly groundwater <br /> monitoring was performed The Phase IV investigation and year of groundwater sampling <br /> confirmed that soil contamination is present in the vicinity of MW-2A and that groundwater <br />' contamination is not present south (up-gradient) of the former USTs Two additional rounds of <br /> groundwater sampling have been conducted since the conclusion of the Phase IV investigation <br />' 1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION <br /> Section l 0 of this CAP provides the introduction Section 2 0 presents the physical <br /> characteristics of the site Section 3.0 presents the nature and extent of contamination S <br /> feasibility Study is provided in Section 4 0 Section 5 0 presents proposed cleanup levels <br /> References are included in Section 6 0 A natural attenuation model is presented in Appendix <br /> A Appendix B includes costing support for the Feasibility Study <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> t <br /> 1 <br />' LTROJECr$OANJDQ1HSA"Cr1ONPL 3 <br />