Laserfiche WebLink
' 24 August 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 02-0950 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />' preservative After collection,the samples were properly labeled,placed in a chilled container, and <br /> transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical laboratory,for analysis The samples were <br />' analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and total xylenes(BTEX)and fuel additives methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(MTBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol(TBA),di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA),and <br /> 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B, and <br /> 3.4. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br />'. 24 June 2005 The contaminant impact to soil and ground water was quantified from laboratory <br /> analytical data <br />' 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At the time of the June 2005 sampling event,depths to ground water ranged from 17 11 feet(MW-3) <br /> to 17 45 feet(MW-2)below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevation at the site averaged <br /> approximately 9 43 feet below mean sea level(MSL),indicating a overall average increase in ground <br /> water elevation of approximately 0 15 feet between March 2005 and June 2005 (Table 1) Ground <br /> water elevation increased in both MW-1 and MW-2, but decreased slightly in MW-3 During this <br /> monitoring event,the ground water levels in the wells were at least 2 feet below the tops of the well <br /> screens,indicating that the wells are screened properly to yield representative shallow ground water <br /> samples <br /> The general ground water was inferred to be flowing toward the northeast under a hydraulic gradient <br /> of approximately 0 002 foot/foot (ft/ft) Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations <br /> as measured on 24 June 2005 Ground water directions and gradients can vary greatly, as they are <br /> influenced by seasonal changes to the static water table <br /> Advanced Geo&nvironmental,Inc <br />