Laserfiche WebLink
Page I of 5 <br /> L v <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Ally Colavita [acolavita@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:26 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement- 15615 So. 7th St (Lathrop) <br /> Thanks, Mike. That is very good advice. We'll look into it. Have a great weekend, and thanks for you <br /> help! <br /> Ally <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:20 PM <br /> To: acolavita@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement - 15615 So. 7th St(Lathrop) <br /> very possible. <br /> some where along this progressive line of previous FS and pilot tests, the RP, or <br /> consultant FOR the RP stated that DPE would be more feasible and cost-effective <br /> at X price than other remedial alternatives at Y price. The EHD doesn't typically see <br /> or care about costs, just as long as it's typically the best bang for the buck. <br /> Then the CUF evals costs after the EHD approves the FS or Pilot or <br /> 1/RAP.....somewhere on their notes for this site, they have X amount circled/listed for <br /> 'remediation' expenses. <br /> You now say it ain't enough and submit additional costs, they will most assuridly go <br /> back to the FS comparative costs and see if you are still 'cost-effective', or like we <br /> say, the cheapest. <br /> IF not, you may get the 'letter'...a letter saying NO DICE.... I get scolded for <br /> approving a NON cost effective approach and the RP gets angry for the denial <br /> letter. <br /> Add to this the CUF insists now on PRE approval for remedial actions, you can be <br /> pretty sure if your added costs meet some accounting line on their rules, you will be <br /> advised more eval/FS is needed before they approve or they will ONLY approve the <br /> lower, first amount you sent in... <br /> times are tough at the CUF and money is tight. this is not a good time to try to get <br /> an expensive RAP preapproved when someone at the CUF thinks it's too <br /> expensive. <br /> Like I told BOB, there's a new approach showing up at the CVRWQCB for WAS <br /> lately. Mr. Barton and the boys are ok-ing more junk staying in the ground/gw and <br /> approving NFA.....Recently 125 ug/1 MtBE in a peripherial well got approved for NFA <br /> by Jim...Margaret and I were pleasantly surprised at the loosening up there.... <br /> 12/19/2008 <br />