Laserfiche WebLink
rage / 01 J <br /> < �%Ww u <br /> take another look at this site and see if you can justify plume size and concentration <br /> and clean up near/against a RR yard and street and a risk to the public. With more <br /> logical approaches to closing sites with higher residuals than we're used to <br /> surfacing, you may want to re-eval this site for the need to RAP vs a NFA... <br /> From: Ally Colavita [mailto:acolavita@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:16 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement- 15615 So. 7th St (Lathrop) <br /> In other words, the CUF may not see these City of Lathrop Fees as reasonable, and they <br /> wouldn't reimburse those payments? <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:12 PM <br /> To: acolavita@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement - 15615 So. 7th St (Lathrop) <br /> AGE float or not, if the CUF takes the time to scrutinize GWE costs overage <br /> against ISCO or SVE-IAS, they may resist payments...the CUF lately has <br /> valued GWE just above ORC or snake oil. <br /> From: Ally Colavita [mailto:acolavita@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:54 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement - 15615 So. 7th St(Lathrop) <br /> Yes. I saw it. We are trying to see if it's feasible to float these costs, as I am certain the <br /> client cannot keep up with the monthly charges. I will get back to you after the new year, <br /> and thanks for taking the time to respond. Have a swell holiday. <br /> Ally <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:07 AM <br /> To: acolavita@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: RE: Langston's Market Agreement - 15615 So. 7th St(Lathrop) <br /> and again, yet one more nail in the coffin for P&T....the outrageous rise in <br /> costs associated with this procedure have made it practically impossibe to <br /> fund/reimburse. Somewhere in my old memory is the "I told you so" <br /> message ringing out. <br /> be that as it may, to answer your question: <br /> feasible to inject??? you'd have a better chance of walking on water in <br /> lead overalls... <br /> no, injecting into the subsurface is under the CVRWQCB approval and the <br /> cost, time for review, and obstacles and liability push this truly out of sight. <br /> 12/19/2008 <br />