Laserfiche WebLink
But you can always check with the CVRWQCB's to see just exactly what <br /> your chances are and the time and money needed to complete/approve it. <br /> Back to reality- <br /> if you plan on changing the already approved RAP/CAP by NOT <br /> discharging to City conveyances, you need to get EHD approval before <br /> you change. Since this site is under CUF reimbursement, changes on <br /> already approved actions with more $$$ being anticipated will require <br /> lead agency approval before the CUF will even consider it. so you'll need <br /> a EHD approval letter. And for me to approve, you'll need to support <br /> feasibility for the change as well as cost-effective against OTHER <br /> remedial actions that could work (feasible) and cost less...Le: insitu ISCO, <br /> SVE-IAS, etc. <br /> so decide if you're going to continue to GWE. if so, get me a revision, <br /> complete with costs. <br /> If not, then re-eval other remedial alternatives for cost-effectiveness and <br /> feasibility and submit your findings/conclusions to the EHD. like another <br /> Feasibility Study, and claim one. IF I ok, send it up to the CUF for pre- <br /> approval. <br /> well grasshopper, there's a lesson in here somewhere...did you see it? <br /> From: Ally Colavita [mailto:acolavita@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:33 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Langston's Market Agreement- 15615 So. 7th St (Lathrop) <br /> Hi Mike— <br /> Re: Langston's – 15615 S. 7th Street, Lathrop & the City of Lathrop discharge fees <br /> Attached is the City of Lathrop's Third response to our request for lower, more <br /> reasonable, discharge fees for the DPE system at Langston's. Currently, the fees <br /> would be $4,500/month. If the system is shut off in one year, the RP would still be <br /> responsible for the remaining $66,000 dollars of the connection fee. Amortized over <br /> two years, the fee is approximately $2,700 a month. <br /> I am preparing a budget for the site and trying to come up with alternatives for the <br /> treated ground water disposal. Pump and haul appears to be more costly then the <br /> City of Lathrop's fees. <br /> Forgive my ignorance in the matter, but is it feasible for us to install an injection well <br /> and inject the treated ground water back into the subsurface. Again, I apologize if <br /> this is a "silly" question. <br /> Thank you for your time, and have a great holiday. <br /> Ally Colavita <br /> Project Scientist <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental, Inc. <br /> 837 Shaw Road, Stockton, CA 95215 <br /> Phone: (209) 467-1006 <br /> 12/19/2008 <br />