Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> The soil samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel,benzene,toluene. <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylene(BTEX), and MTBE by USEPA Test Methods 8015M and 8020. II <br /> Analytical laboratory results are presented in Appendix 3. The results are summarized in Table <br /> 1 and plotted on Figure 6. <br /> Upgradient suggested the field observations made during drilling(i.e. hydrocarbons present only <br /> at 15 and 20 feet bgs in soil boring B1)were valid when compared with analytical laboratory <br /> results. No MTBE was reportedly detected in either of these samples. Diesel-range hydrocarbons <br /> were detected in the water grab sample from soil boring B3 at a concentration of 1700 µ1l. The ` <br /> source of this diesel fuel was most likely from fueling operations spillage. <br /> Upgradient(1999)concluded the following from the subsurface investigation: <br /> (1). Drilling in and around the UST excavation indicate that fuel leakage from the fueling <br /> facility was limited to the fueling piping immediately around the excavation. The boring <br /> through the excavation.(B 1)indicated that diesel penetrated less than 10 feet below the <br /> former excavation floor,to a maximum depth of 20 to 25 feet bgs. Soil borings within 5 i <br /> feet of the lateral margins of the.excavation reportedly encountered no contaminated soil <br /> whatsoever. This indicated that lateral leakage from the UST or dispenser did not occur <br /> to any appreciable extent.Upgradient reported that the depth to groundwater in the <br /> Stockton area in general was generally near its historically highest level (1999), and was <br /> reported to be between 40 and 45 feet bgs at a site less than 2000 feet to the north. Based <br /> on long-term groundwater measurements by the Flood Control Section of the San Joaquin <br /> County Public Works Department,Upgradient concluded that it was unlikely that <br /> groundwater had been shallower than 35 feet at the site. Upgradient concluded that it <br /> was therefore not likely that the saturated zone had been impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. <br /> MainlDhEnvironmentaRl STE\WorkplanSWorkplan l 1192007.wpd 9 <br />