My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010336 (2)
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010336 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 11:23:19 AM
Creation date
5/21/2020 10:29:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010336
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
increases in water levels versus distance (Appendix F), indicates a maximum radius of influence of <br /> approximately 46 feet (MW-1) The maximum increase in water level was at observation well <br /> MW-13A (0 1 feet), located approximately 16 feet from the AS well Water levels measurements <br /> at the end of the AS test (23 5 hours) had equilibrated to within 0 01 to 0 03 of a foot of initial <br /> readings, indicating that water levels in the nearby diverting canal may have had some influence on <br /> the water level measurements collected during the pilot test <br /> The dissolved oxygen measurements showed no consistent trends during the pilot test (Table 5), <br /> therefore, the data was not used as a determining factor in predicting the radius of influence Graphs <br /> of pressure influence,VOC concentrations, water levels, and dissolved oxygen versus time were also <br /> prepared and are presented in Appendix F <br /> In each of the monitored parameters, except for dissolved oxygen content, a response was measured <br /> in both observation wells MW-13 and MW-13A(Table 5) A comparison of the data indicates that <br /> the responses were less pronounced in MW-13A than in MW-13 This is apparently due to both the <br /> greater distance from the AS well (MW-13 @ 9ft and MW-13A @ 16 ft) and the location of the <br /> screen sections (MW-13 @ 39-59 ft and MW-13A @ 71-76 ft) Based on the measured responses <br /> in these wells, both a vertical and horizontal influence was produced across the unsaturated zone <br /> • during the pilot test <br /> Combined AS/SVE Test <br /> A combined soil vapor extraction/air sparging pilot test was performed using VE-1 as the SVE well <br /> and IAS-1 as the AS well The pilot test was operated at three different extraction and infection <br /> rates Existing monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-13, and MW-13A and newly <br /> installed dual-completion well VE-2 were used as observation wells during the test (Table 6) The <br /> monitoring points were selected to provide multi-directional data at varying distances from the <br /> infection point Vacuum and flow readings were measured with magnehelic gauges Off-gas <br /> concentrations were measured with a PID prior to treatment with the VACLEAN unit One off-gas <br /> sample was collected in a Tedlar bag at the end of the combined pilot test for laboratory analysis <br /> The combined soil vapor extraction/air sparging pilot test determined that a net vacuum was <br /> maintained at approximately 30 feet from the SVE well at a vacuum of 92 in w c and a sparging <br /> pressure of 3 psig The results are presented in a graph(Appendix F) showing the pressure versus <br /> distance from the SVE well This data documents the capture of the AS off-gases within the design <br /> SVE radius of influence <br /> • The vapor analytical results showed a TPH(g)concentration of 62,000 pg/L, a benzene concentration <br /> of 85 µg/L, and a total BTEX concentration of 8,345 µg/L A copy of the analytical report is <br /> III-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.