My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012625
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SONORA
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 1:31:17 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 12:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012625
RECORD_ID
PR0545695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003877
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #2
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SONORA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13731025
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 W SONORA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
's" +' —lir ,Ir _ EEO 01 <br /> WE <br /> g y k <br /> During sampling, the geologist used a field photoionization detector (PID) to characterize <br /> the relative levels of hydrocarbons. Field instruments such as the PIU are useful for <br /> indicating relative levels of hydrocarbon vapors, but do not detect the concentration of <br /> hydrocarbons present with the same precision as laboratory analyses. One of the sampies <br /> in brass sleeves nOL selected for laboratory analysis at each sampling interval was testes in <br /> the field using an PID. This testing was performed by placing the intake probe of the PID <br /> against the soil after opening the brass container. <br /> Logging of Barings <br /> Soil cuttings and samples were logged using the Unified Soil Classification System. Samples <br /> not selected for chemical analysis and the soil in the sampler shoe were extruded in the field <br /> and examined using visual and manual methods. Logs include records of texture, color, <br /> P=+ moisture, plasticity,consistency,blow counts,:+•,d any other characteristics noted along with <br /> evidence for the presence of hydrocarbons such as soil staining, obvious product odor, and <br /> PID readings. After terminating the borings, they were backfilled using a tremic pipe with <br /> a cement-bentonite slurry to surface grade. <br /> Drill Cuttings <br /> Drill cuttings evaluated as having hydrocarbon conce:urations greater than 100 parts per <br /> million were separated fron-, those evaluated as having less than 100 parts per million. <br /> Evaluation was based either on snit discoloration or on measurements made using a <br /> photoionization detector or similar instrument. Readings were taken by placing the intake <br /> probe of the instrument near the soil in the brass sleeve promptly after opening the sampler. <br /> The drill cuttings from the borings drummed in the December 1988 event were placed on <br /> and covered with plastic sheeting in the May 1990 event. <br /> Ground-Nater Monitoring Well Construction <br /> The wells were constructed using clean 2-inch-inner-diameter, thread-jointed, Schedule 40 <br /> polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing. No chemicals, glues, or solvents were used in well <br /> construction. The screened portion of the well consisted of factory-perforated casing with <br /> 0.020-inch-wide slots and extended from the total depth of the boring to about 10 feet below <br /> grade. Solid Casing was set from the top of the screen to several inches below surface grade. <br /> AAp/ied GeDS,ystems <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.