Laserfiche WebLink
Page I of 4 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna[EH1 <br /> Sent: Monday,January 24, 2011 1:28 PM <br /> To: Tom.Dawson' <br /> Subject: RE: Target Store T1526 Manteca, California(License Agreement) <br /> I appreciate your understanding and your tolerance to my inclusions into this procedure. <br /> I just want to make it clear that Target and AKF will have multiple chances to work this out to a <br /> sucessful outcome. If the outcome is unsucessful after all efforts to compromise, the County <br /> will step in and issue a formal reply. It was, and is my intention to bring attention to those <br /> involved this point. <br /> I have been down this road many times with large and small businesses and the many <br /> responsible parties that initially were unable to come to a mutual agreement. I am aware of <br /> the eventual outcome if a mutual agreement is not reached. Although I mostly understand <br /> Target's and AKF differing positions, I wish to make it clear that the SJCEHD has a regulatory <br /> mandate to conform with our Well Ordinance and will exercise this requirement if an <br /> agreement is not reached. <br /> I have confidence that Target and AKF can reach an equitable and reasonable compromise <br /> and i will do all I can to help towards that goal. It is my intention to keep the County <br /> from entering this formally, but understand, there is a point when I will not have that option. <br /> as always, <br /> thank you for your time.. <br /> Michael Infurna <br /> SJCEHD <br /> PS. <br /> I have dealth with situations where large oil companies dealing with much smaller entities <br /> (neighbors) have issued or accepted 'hold harmless' agreements from these adjacent parcel <br /> owners when access situations arise. These type of documents usually dealth with one's <br /> desire/requirement access the other's property to install a boring or well. Some of these <br /> agreements are short use/need and have expiration dates. Could you see if an <br /> indemnification clause/hold harmless agreement would/could work here? <br /> mike. <br /> From: Tom.Dawson [mailto:Tom.Dawson@target.com] <br /> Sent: Monday,January 24, 2011 12:28 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Target Store T1526 Manteca, California(License Agreement) <br /> Mike—As i have stated several times already, l will have to circle back with our Risk Management and <br /> 1/24/2011 <br />