Laserfiche WebLink
Lopez Property Page 2 <br /> 1601 Turnpike Road April 2, 2009 <br /> Stockton, California M06 <br /> • The 1,2-dich roethane (1,2-DCA) plume from the Lopez site appears to be <br /> commingling with the 1,2-DCA plume from the Comfort Air site at depths of <br /> approximate) fifty to sixty-five feet bsg. <br /> • For the third consecutive quarter, contaminants of concern were not detected in <br /> groundwater collected from MW-9, the deepest on-site monitoring well screened <br /> between 110 end 120 feet bsg. <br /> The EHD concurs th t the vertical and lateral extent of petroleum-hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> groundwater appears w be defined, except east to southeast of the former USTs at depths of <br /> approximately fifty to sixty-five feet bsg. This is evident by the detection of 1,2-DCA at <br /> sixty-three to sixty-six feet bsg in soil boring B6; therefore, the EHD recommends that <br /> additional monitoring wells be installed east to southeast of B6 and Comfort Air <br /> monitoring well M -5. The wells should be screened within the hydrological unit <br /> identified by AGE as HU2 (approximately forty-eight to sixty-eight feet bsg). The EHD <br /> will not comment co cerning the recommended transfer of Comfort Air monitoring well <br /> MW-8B to the responsible party of the Lopez property until information is available from <br /> these newly-installed wells. <br /> The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) is requiring <br /> evaluation of Enviroamental Screening Levels (ESLs) and California Human Health <br /> Screening Levels (C SLs) for soil gas published by San Francisco Bay Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board and the potential for vapor intrusion into buildings for closure <br /> consideration of sites having residual contamination left in place. Therefore, you are <br /> directed to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion inside the buildings located onsite. <br /> Please submit either a work plan to EHD by July 15, 2009, to assess the potential for vapor <br /> intrusion into the existing onsite buildings, or a rational, with technical support, for <br /> discounting vapor intrusion into the buildings as a potential hazard for this site. <br /> AGE has recommended the preparation of a work plan for an ozone bench-scale pilot test <br /> to determine if this remedial method is appropriate at this site. The EHD approves the <br /> proposal to conduct an ozone bench-scale test to identify and evaluate generation, <br /> mobilization, or preci itation of harmful chemical species that could degrade groundwater <br /> or aquifer quality as result of injecting oxidizers into the subsurface. Please submit the <br /> work plan to the EHDIby June 15, 2009. <br /> The EHD believes a feasibility study/remedial action plan (RAP) is needed to identify a <br /> remedial technology, or a combination of technologies, capable of mitigating petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon contami 'ation beneath the site. The RAP should compare various remedial <br /> methods to determine the most cost-effective for removing contaminants based on site <br /> specific data. Provide estimates and calculations for the contaminant masses in <br /> groundwater and soil as part of this study. <br />