Laserfiche WebLink
7 Mr. Benjamin Hall 0 -3 - 15 October 2004 <br /> Musco Family Olive Company <br /> Groundwater Impacts from Impounded Wastewater <br /> Groundwater monitoring data collected from monitoring well 16 (MW-16), approximately 220 feet <br /> downgradient of the dam, showed a steady and pronounced increase in calcium, magnesium, and <br /> alkalinity shortly after wastewater was impounded in the reservoir. The memorandum concludes this is <br /> sufficient evidence that waste constituents from impounded wastewater have impacted groundwater. <br /> The report in contrast attributes the recent steady and pronounced increase in calcium, magnesium, and <br /> alkalinity to natural weathering and/or past agricultural practices. The report does not explain why the <br /> effects of natural weathering and/or past unspecified agricultural practices can be discerned in MW-16 <br /> only shortly after the impoundment of wastewater. Staff's interpretation of the data and conclusion are <br /> based on abundant evidence in Regional Board files that show high-strength organic waste (e.g., food <br /> processing wastewater discharges, unlined sludge drying beds)moving through soil has the potential to <br /> result in or contribute to the degradation of groundwater from calcium,magnesium, and alkalinity, as <br /> well as from other waste constituents and byproducts. Microbial decomposition of organic waste creates <br /> organic acids and carbon dioxide, and the latter dissolves in soil-pore liquid to create a weak acid. The <br /> generation of these byproducts appears to accelerate the natural soil mineral weathering process and <br /> elevate concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and alkalinity in soil in <br /> liquid. To our knowledge, no <br /> scientific evidence in the technical literature better explains why groundwater passing under soils loaded <br /> with high-strength organic waste often contains elevated concentrations of calcium,magnesium, and <br /> alkalinity, and it is reasonable to attribute the change in quality detected in MW-16 to the same reaction <br /> phenomenon. <br /> The report also states it is unlikely that impounded wastewater infiltrating to groundwater would have <br /> traveled significant lateral distances to reach MW-16 within the first 18 months of reservoir operation. In <br /> the technical report Packground Groundwater Quality Report, dated 30 July 2004 and received 2 August <br /> 2004, the velocity of area groundwater is estimated as ranging from 73 feet/year for silt and 372 feet/year <br /> for silty sand. Using the faster velocity, wastewater from the reservoir could theoretically travel to <br /> MW-16 within about 17 months after initial impoundment. Depending upon the location and extent of <br /> sandy/gravelly lenses between the bottom of the reservoir and MW-16, as well as the increase in <br /> hydraulic head resulting from the impoundment of wastewater in the reservoir, the groundwater travel <br /> time could be significantly faster. <br /> Blanket Drain Discharge <br /> Both your letter and the report conclude that the discharge from the blanket drain consists primarily of <br /> naturally occurring groundwater that is flowing through the blanket drain as a result of an artificial artesian <br /> condition. Using groundwater elevation data obtained in December 2003 and an assumed hydraulic <br /> gradient of 0.01 foot/foot, the report projects the elevation of groundwater in the area of the dam to be <br /> about the same as the natural ground surface, or about 12 to 22 feet above the reservoir's blanket drain at <br /> 298 feet MSL. The report concludes these apparent hydraulic head differences are sufficient to induce a <br /> vertical upward hydraulic gradient in the area of the dam that prevents or significantly impedes the <br /> infiltration of impounded wastewater through the soils underlying.the reservoir. The report appears not to <br /> consider the hydraulic head attributable to the impounded wastewater, which can approach 40 feet when <br /> the dam is operated at its maximum pool elevation of 350 feet MSL. Additional information and technical <br /> reasoning from Musco are necessary to persuade staff the hydraulic head created by the reservoir and its <br /> construction does not affect the groundwater flow dynamics in this area. <br />