Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Benjamin Hall. <br /> 4 _ 15 October 2o04 <br /> Musco Family Olive Company <br /> The memorandum presented a simple chloride-based mass balance calculation that determined up to <br /> 57 percent of the blanket drain discharge could be composed of impounded wastewater. The report rejects <br /> this analysis as too simplistic for the area's complex hydrogeology. The report indicates chloride <br /> concentrations in groundwater underlying the discharge site are naturally variable,uses the results of a <br /> similar mass balance calculation based on boron to indicate impounded wastewater is not impacting <br /> groundwater, and mentions (but does not cite) studies to suggest that chloride is not necessarily <br /> conservative under all conditions. The report does not provide specific technical justification on why <br /> chloride is not suitable for use as a conservative tracer in this discharge situation or explain why the <br /> apparent natural variability in groundwater boron concentrations would not also preclude its use as a <br /> conservative tracer. We acknowledge that boron may be suitable for use as a conservative tracer because of <br /> its very low potential for retardation/attenuation by soils/aquifer material, and that its use in the mass <br /> balance calculation, as presented in the report, yields results that diverge from that obtained by using <br /> chloride. However, we were unable to replicate the values presented in the report's Table 1, Summary of <br /> Mass Balance Results for Seepage Contributions. Using the mass balance equation[ with the boron data <br /> provided in the table for the reservoir, seepage, MW-3, and MW-14,we derived values for the percent of <br /> seepage flow composed of wastewater of —78% (based on MW-3) and 27% (based on MW-14). Therefore, <br /> based on the boron data, up to 27% of the seepage is composed of impounded wastewater if the quality of <br /> groundwater emerging from the seep is similar to that in MW-14 upgradient from the resgrvoir. <br /> Conclusion <br /> The report states, "we believe that a significant portion of the liquid captured by the blanket drain is of <br /> natural groundwater origin." This belief appears to be based on the erroneous values derived in the <br /> report for percent wastewater contribution to seepage based on boron mass balance calculations. Even if <br /> the belief is correct, it would not preclude waste constituents in the remaining portion of the liquid <br /> causing or contributing to degradation of State and federal waters when exiting the dam's blanket drain <br /> and passing through downgradient monitoring wells. Absent conclusive evidence that the elevated <br /> constituents discharged from the blanket drain are not from or due to the large adjacent waste <br /> management unit, Musco is in violation or threatened violation of WDRs Prohibition A.I. The proposed <br /> return system must be constructed and placed in operation forthwith. Further, absent sufficient <br /> definitive technical information as to the integrity of the waste management unit, either by better <br /> geochemical evidence or more complete evidence of the containment features,Musco will continue to be <br /> cited as in violation of Task 16. <br /> Tracer Dye or Isotope Study <br /> Musco asserts without definitive technical documentation that the reservoir construction precludes <br /> leachate of waste constituents and decomposition byproducts in quantities that would degrade <br /> groundwater and it thereby meets the objective though not the letter of Task 16. By law Musco has the <br /> burden of providing conclusive evidence that its waste management units are protective of State waters. It <br /> is not sufficient to cast doubt upon other conclusions to the contrary that data can reasonably support. <br /> The evidence concerning reservoir construction, hydrogeology, and geochemistry provided by Musco <br /> thus far is at best inconclusive as to protection, and it strongly suggests wastewater is not being <br /> effectively contained. The use of the reservoir in Musco's proposed long-term strategy does not diminish <br /> [B]wastewater * Vwastewater+ [B]groundwater * Vgroundwater= [B]seepage * Vseepage <br /> Setting Vseepage= 1 and expressing Vgronndwa a as 1 -Vwastewater yields the following: <br /> Vwastewater= ([B]seepage [B]groundwater) / ([Bllwastewater- [131groundwater) <br />