Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality C,9,pq, r r <br /> Central Valley Region nrc,pA'r SFp4 E <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair <br /> Winston H.Hickox !19 tt it t ^•• I: 00 Gray Davis <br /> Secretaryfor Fresno Branch Office Governor <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swreb.ca.gov/—mgcb5 <br /> Protection 1685 E Street Fresno,California 93706-2020 <br /> Phone(559)445-5116•FAX(559)445-5910 <br /> 18 July 2003 <br /> Mr. Ben Hall Mr. Nick Musco <br /> Musco Family Olive Company Studley Company <br /> 17950 Via Nicolo 17950 Via Nicolo <br /> Tracy, CA 95376 Tracy, CA 95376 <br /> LTU ASSINIILATIVE CAPACITY STUDY EXTENSION REQUEST, MUSCO FAMILY <br /> OLIVE COMPANY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> By 3 July 2003 letter, Ms. Paula Hansen and Mr. Stuart Childs of Kennedy/Jenks Consultants requested <br /> on behalf of Musco Family Olive Company (Musca) an extension to 15 August 2004 for the submittal - <br /> date of the Land Treatment Unit (LTU) Assimilative Capacity Report for Musco's land application <br /> treatment system. Provision G.2.f of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. R5-2002-0148 (WDRs) <br /> requires the submittal by 1 August 2003 of a report that contains information contained in Finding Nos. <br /> 72 through 74 of the WDRs. These findings include descriptions of performance standards applicable to <br /> Musco's LTU prescribed in Title 27, California Code of Regulations, §§20005 et seq. The letter <br /> attributes the delay to obtaining approval from Regional Board staff of Musco's proposed <br /> hydrogeological investigation work plan. This work includes the installation of pan lysimeters required <br /> by the WDRs as essential for documenting LTU performance. It describes a plan to evaluate the <br /> assimilative capacity of LTU soils by estimating the potential of the soil column to treat constituents in <br /> Musco's wastewater. The letter indicates the plan will involve the analysis of soil samples from the <br /> LTU for various physical characteristics, development of a model of water transport through soil, and <br /> use of the model to assess zones of aerobic and anaerobic conditions through the soil. <br /> The letter explains that, due to cash flow problems, Musco prefers to perform the soil sampling work for <br /> the assimilative capacity while equipment is onsite for installation of additional groundwater monitoring <br /> wells, which are required to implement the hydrogeological investigation work plan. We will transmit <br /> under separate cover comments on this work plan,but anticipate specifying 13 locations where deep (at <br /> least 250 feet deep) exploratory borings should be drilled by the mud rotary method and geophysically <br /> logged. While we appreciate Musco's desire to reduce monitoring costs, the soil sampling required as <br /> part of the LTU assimilative capacity study should be expedited to ensure sufficient information is <br /> collected over the summer months when loadings are expected to be highest. <br /> Staff cannot extend the 1 August 2003 deadline stipulated in Provision G.2.f of the WDRs as it requires <br /> Regional Board action. However, Musco's request for more time appears reasonable under the <br /> circumstances and staff will not initiate enforcement action over this delay pending Regional Board <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 2d Recycled Paper <br /> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways <br /> you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/mgcb5 <br />