Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 21 December 2001 <br />' AGE NC Project No 95-0143 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />' 4 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br />' The elevation of ground water in the twelve wells was calculated by subtracting the depth to water <br /> from the surveyed casing elevation (Table 1) Ground water elevations decreased in the monitored <br /> wells an average 0 95 feet between the August 2001 and November 2001 monitoring events Ground <br />' water was within the screened intervals ofMW-10,MW-15, MW-16, MW-17,MW-22,MW-23 and <br /> MW-24 and inferred to be within the screened interval of each vapor well Ground water ranged <br /> from 0 24 feet to 5 86 feet above the screened interval in the other seven monitoring wells The <br />' approximate flow direction was toward the north-northeast with a gradient of 0 001 feet/feet at the <br /> subject property Ground water elevation contours for the November 2001 monitoring event are <br /> illustrated in Figure 3 <br /> 4 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLES <br /> 1 During the November 2001 monitoring event, TPH-g was detected in samples collected from <br /> monitoring wells MW-3,MW-6, MW-7 and MW-9 at concentrations ranging from 180 µg/l(MW-7) <br />' to 150,000 gg/l (MW-3) BTEX compounds were detected in wells MW-3, MW-6, MW--7 and <br /> MW-9 at concentrations as high as 35,000 µg/l toluene (MW-3) TBA was detected in the sample <br /> collected from MW-24 at a concentrations of 73 }tg/l MTBE, DIPE, ETRE, TAME, ethanol and <br /> methanol were not detected in samples collected from the site during the November 2001 sampling <br /> event Figure 4 illustrates the approximate extent of TPH-g and benzene contamination in ground <br /> water <br /> Measurable free product was not encountered in an of the wells on the site Analytical results of <br /> p y yt <br /> ground water samples collected during the November 2001 monitoring event are summarized on <br /> ITable 2 Analytical results of historical ground water samples are summarized on Table 3 The <br /> laboratory report (MAI Laboratory IDs 83611 through 83622) and chain-of-custody forms are <br /> included in Appendix B <br /> 5.0. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE concludes <br /> • Ground water elevation decreased approximately 0 95 feet between August 2001 and <br /> November 2001 Ground water elevation was within the screened interval of MW-10, <br /> MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24 and the five vapor extraction wells, <br /> • but above the screened interval of the other five monitoring wells The inferred ground water <br /> flow direction remains variably toward the north to northeast at the site <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironnientai,Inc <br />