Laserfiche WebLink
' 10 December 2001 <br /> AGE NC Project No 95-0143 <br />' Page 7of10 <br />' • VW-2 (located 24 feet toward the northwest) at 0 33 feet after 1,335 minutes of pumping <br /> operation, <br />' • MW-7 (located 48 feet toward the west) at 0 20 feet after 1,335 minutes of pumping <br /> operation, <br /> • VW-4 (located 48 feet toward the southwest) at 0 20 feet after 1,335 minutes of pumping <br />' operation, <br /> • VW-1 (located 54 feet toward the west) at 0 20 feet after 1,335 minutes of pumpmg <br />' operation, and <br /> • MW-9 (located 140 feet toward the north) at 0 12 feet after 1,335 minutes of pumping <br />' operation <br /> Copies of field logs with water level data from the eight wells are included In Appendix I A semi- <br /> logarithmic plot of draw-down versus distance for EW-3, EW-4, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, VW-1, <br /> VW-2 and VW-4 is in Appendix.7 Table 4 summarizes draw-down results of the constant pumpmg <br /> rate test <br /> Based on data recorded by the transducers, aquifer stabilization was achieved utilizing an 8-gpm <br /> pumping rate after approximately 8 hours of pumping operation <br /> 3 2 2 Aquifer Pumping Analysis <br /> The maximum ground water draw-down in wells EW-4, MW-3, VW-2, MW-7, VW-4, VW-1 and <br /> MW-9 versus the distance of each well from the extraction point were graphed on semi-logarithmic <br /> paper(Appendix J),utilizing the Distance-Drawdown Method(Jacob straight-line method), general <br /> transmissivity, storativity and hydraulic conductivity values were determined(Appendix K) Ground <br /> water levels in the seven observation wells all appeared to be influenced with measurable draw-down <br /> during the pumping test <br /> Utilizing data collected from the observation wells, a transnussivity value was calculated at <br /> 1,120 ft'/day, a storativity value calculated at 0 099, a hydraulic conductivity value of 0 147 cm/sec <br /> and a radius of influence projected at 160 feet utilizing a semi-logarithmic plot of draw-down versus <br /> distance (Appendices J and K) Results of the aquifer ground water pumping test are summarized <br /> in Table 4, a site plan depicting the radius of influence during the 17 and 18 July 2001 pumping test <br /> is depicted in Figure 3 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />