Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 12 January 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0143 <br />' Page 2 of 5 <br /> installed from approximately 25 to 20 5 feet bsg A nominal 2-foot bentonite plug was then installed <br /> above the filter pack The wells were then grouted to near the ground surface with portland cement <br />' A water-tight,traffic-rated well box was installed over the ozone sparge wells The well locations are <br /> shown on Figure 3 In-situ ozone sparge well construction is illustrated in Figure 4 <br /> I2 1 2 Ozone Distribution System Installation <br /> Following installation of the ozone sparge wells,trenches were dug from the ozone generator location <br /> to each well head for Installation 318-inch and 112-inch PVC tubing The tubing is utilized to distribute <br /> the ozone to individual wells Following installation of the tubing, the trenches were backfilled to <br /> surface grade A schematic diagram of the ozone distribution system is illustrated in Figure 3 <br /> 2 1 3 Ozone Generator Installation <br /> To provide ozone for the in-situ ozone sparge system, AGE installed an ASI ozone generating unit <br /> lie The unit is rated by the manufacturer to produce 0 5 pounds of ozone per day The ozone generator <br /> is equipped with solenoid valves to control the distribution of ozone to each sparge well Ozone is <br /> cycled through each valve for one-hour intervals utilizing a computer controlled timer Based on the <br /> average sparging period per day perwell, approximately0 03 pounds of ozone is sparged at each well <br /> during a 24-hour period A calculation for ozone sparge rates is included in Appendix A <br /> 22 QUARTERLY WELL MONITORING PROCEDURLS <br /> IA quarterly ground water monitoring event was performed on 08 May 2003 The ground water <br /> monitoring was performed in accordance with the revised monitoring schedule established during a <br /> meeting with EHD staff on 25 September 2002 <br /> 2 2 1 Well Monitoring and Purging <br /> A Sohnst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in twelve monitoring <br /> wells at the site and in fifteen monitoring wells at the neighboring Madison site relative to the tops <br /> of the well casings The ground water elevations (Table 1) and hydraulic gradient (Figure 5) were <br /> Idetermined from these data <br /> . After measurement of depths to water,between 4 25 and 13 5 gallons of water(approximately three <br />' casing-water volumes)were purged from wells MW-3, MW-6, MW-7, MW-10, MW-14, MW-15, <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> I <br />