Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Report - Third Quarter 2000 <br /> I Former CHASE CHEVROLET (Van Buren) Facihty <br /> 424 North Van Buren Street, Stockton, California <br />' 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br />' At the request ofMr Jeffery Setness,attorney for the property owners,Advanced GeoEnvironmental, <br /> Inc (AGE)has prepared this quarterly report summarizing field activities performed during the third <br /> quarter of 2000 at 424 North Van Buren Street,Stockton, California(Figure 1 -Location Map) The <br />' scope of work performed on the site during the quarter included monitoring concentrations of <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons in ground water on the site, operation and monitoring of the soil <br /> vapor extraction (SVE) and in-situ air sparging (LAS) systems and preparation of this report <br />' Structures and monitoring well locations on the site and adjacent area are illustrated in Figure 2 -Site <br /> Plan Background information was s1?mn rimmed in Corrective Action Plan -December 1996 and in <br /> Quarterly Report-May 1999, both prepared by AGE <br />' 2.0. PROCEDURES <br /> Field activities were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the Regional Water <br />'. Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB-CVR) and by the San Joaquin County <br /> Public Health Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) for the investigation of <br /> underground storage tank(UST)sites Field procedures for the monitoring ofthe remediation system <br />' and performance of ground water monitoring and sampling are described below <br /> 2 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 21 and 22 August 2000, a Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground <br />' water in nine monitoring wells and five vapor extraction wells at the site and in fifteen monitoring <br /> wells at the Madison site relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water elevations(Table <br /> 1) and hydraulic gradient (Figure 3) were determined from these data <br />' After measurement of depths to water, each monitoring well at the site was purged using a two-stage <br /> submersible purge pump The pump was decontaminated prior to purging each well using an <br />' Alconox solution and clean tap water Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were <br /> measured at regular intervals during purging using a Hydac water analyzer Approximately twelve <br /> to fifteen gallons of water were removed from each well except for MW-9, from which forty-five <br />' gallons of water were purged (approximately three casing water volumes) All purged water was <br /> stored in 55-gallon DOT-approved drums on-site Field data and field logs are included in Appendix <br />' A <br /> I <br /> Rdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />