SU0013378 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

o,q�lN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY �.• '.o r:• :i DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION 1 1810 E. HAZELTON AVE., STOCKTON, CA 95205 CHET DAVISSON c4�iFua��o PLANNING PHONE: 209/468-3120 Director BUILDING PHONE: 209/468-3123 JERRY HERZICK NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION PHONE: 209/468-3021 Deputy Director RENE JACKSON Deputy Director April 26, 1989 11 � . TOM WALKER Deputy Director APR MEMORANDUM TO: Development Com ittee FROM: Harry Isla Associate Planner SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATIONS GP-89-18 AND SU-89-17 OF TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSPORT ---------------------------------------------------------------- The Development Committee will review these preapplications on April 26, 1989 . This site contains 326 acres located between the Delta-Mendota Canal and the California Aqueduct , west of the intersection of Patterson Pass Road and Schulte Road. The proposals are a General Plan Map Amendment from Limited Industrial to Agriculture and a Major Subdivision to create 55 industrial lots. If this project is carried forward to the application stage, the applicant will have to submit a Zone Reclassification application to rezone the property from M-2/L, AG-40/S-C and M-2/L/S-C to M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) . Staff questions whether additional industrially planned acreage is required in the project vicinity. Southeast of the intersec- tion of Schulte Road and Patterson Pass Road, there is an 80-acre industrially planned site that has been only partially developed. More recently, a preapplication has been submitted to add an additional 80 acres east of that site to the General Plan. The existing and proposed General Plan designations southeast of the intersection are Limited Industrial . It would seem appropriate to require a marketing study to justify provision of additional Limited Industrial land in the project vicinity. A more basic issue is whether the County should establish a major industrial area in the vicinity of Schulte Road and Patterson Pass Road. With this proposal , there would be a total industrially planned acreage of 486 acres, all of which would have the Limited Industrial General Plan designation. Staff believes that the proposal is inconsistent with General Plan policies for preservation of agricultural land for main- tenance of land use compatibility and for the provision of an adequate circulation system. The proposal would eliminate 326 acres of land from agricultural production while there is available 40 acres of vacant industrially planned land nearby.