My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013380
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
GP-89-11
>
SU0013380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2020 4:22:18 PM
Creation date
6/2/2020 4:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013380
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
GP-89-11
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376-
APN
20904003
ENTERED_DATE
5/29/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
PATTERSON PASS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Kitty Walker January 27, 1989 <br /> "Mountain House" New Town Proposal Page 2 <br /> Another example of a problem 1 can foresee would be in the delivery of police <br /> protection services. Although there are several types of special districts <br /> which could be used to deliver such services, it is normally the practice for <br /> such districts to contract with the Sheriff' s Department to provide police pro- <br /> tection. Unless this is followed, there is a basic question cf whether the <br /> Sheriff of the county involved will deputize officers which are not city police- <br /> men to exercise police authority in the unincorporated area. Most Sheriffs are <br /> very reluctant to extend their police authority to an area unless they are pro- <br /> viding the staffing. In this instance, it would be impossible for one county to <br /> contract to provide the service and extend it to the adjacent county without the <br /> express consent of the Sheriff in the neighboring county. <br /> The eventual size planned for this community argues for the creation of a City <br /> government. This again raises serious problems because of its bi-county loca- <br /> tion. Currently under California State law a city cannot extend its authority <br /> across county lines. Although changes in county boundaries can be negotiated <br /> between counties, I am unaware of any such change which has been successfully <br /> negotiated in recent history. Essentially, the proposal is to build what <br /> amounts to a city in a geographic location which legally prevents it from <br /> becoming a city. <br /> Financing Plan <br /> There is insufficient information in this initial planned community proposal to <br /> formulate a financial plan for the provision of public services. Since the <br /> creation of a city is impossible, we have to assume that services would be pro- <br /> vided by special districts or the counties. To the extent the two counties were <br /> required to extend services such as police protection, it would be impossible <br /> for the community to be guaranteed the level of police protection suggested in <br /> the preliminary report. San Joaquin County for example dispatches its Sheriffs <br /> patrol from a location at French Camp and would have no way of guaranteeing <br /> immediate response to calls for police assistance. Likewise the Tracy Rural <br /> Fire District, using a small full-time staff plus volunteers, would need new <br /> resources to service such a community. <br /> A new multi-county district could be created, but they would not have access to <br /> any of the base property tax. Transfers to districts under our County' s poli- <br /> cies occur only when a district takes over a similar service previously provided <br /> by an existing district. Consequently, the alternative is the establishment of <br /> substantial special taxes or benefit assessments against the properties to sup- <br /> port the service. We are unaware of any significant source of revenue which <br /> would be redirected to support basic municipal-type services for this community <br /> if it remains unincorporated. <br /> If a new city were contemplated, an in-depth study of the various sources of <br /> potential revenue would have to be developed. A transfer of property tax to a <br /> newly formed city by statute is based upon the cost of services previously pro- <br /> vided by the county. We would argue strenuously against the provision from <br /> General Funds of services to this community during a development period prior to <br /> potential incorporation. This would essentially eliminate any property tax <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.