Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 2 <br /> PC: 4-9-92 <br /> GP-89-11 <br /> Page 16 <br /> REFERRALS AND REPLIES <br /> Application referrals describing the latest revision to the proposed land use diagram were mailed to public <br /> agencies on January 24, 1992, with replies requested by February 24, 1992. <br /> A comprehensive referral distribution was also completed on July 30, 1990, when the project was first <br /> deemed complete but before the Environmental Impact Report was prepared. <br /> Draft EIRs were distributed on December 16, 1991, and Final EIRs were distributed on March 26, 1992. <br /> The commenting agencies listed below are only the ones that responded to the latest application referral. <br /> Most agencies chose instead to comment on the EIR, and their comments are included in Volume III of <br /> the Final EIR. <br /> San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District (response: 2-20-92): <br /> The District made no additional comments to those that they made on the Draft EIR. <br /> City of Tracy (response: 2-24-92): <br /> The City provided numerous detailed comments specifically related to the revisions in the land use <br /> diagram. See the staff analysis (letter attached). <br /> San Joaquin County Council of Governments (response: 1-31-92): <br /> COG had no additional comments to those expressed in their comment letter on the Draft EIR. <br /> San Joaquin County Department of Parks and Recreation (response: 2-6-92): <br /> Parks and Recreation had no comment. <br /> San Joaquin Farm Bureau Federation (response: 2-23-92): <br /> The Farm Bureau supports the proposed GPA as long as specified mitigation measures are imposed. <br /> They assert that development should first occur on non-contracted land, as they cannot support the <br /> findings for cancellation. <br /> NOTE: A copy of the full agency and public distribution list for the Mountain House General Plan <br /> Amendment and related Williamson Act Contract Cancellations is available from the <br /> Planning Division. <br />