Laserfiche WebLink
FIELD ACTIVITIES <br />On April 27, 1992, Scrivner, under contract to Kleinfelder, removed the pavement and soil <br />cover over the tank. Due to water lines along the west and south sides, Scrivner excavated <br />only along the north and east sides of the tank to free it for removal. Due to the presence <br />of the water lines mentioned above, the service and vent lines were left in place from the <br />edge of the excavation to the previous location of the pump. <br />On April 28, 1992, Scrivner removed the tank with the approval of the local fire marshall <br />and SJCEHD. Upon removal, the tank was visually inspected by Kleinfelder and Mr. Bill <br />Snavely (SJCEHD). The tank appeared to be in food condition. Although approximately <br />40 percent of the tank appeared rusted, the remainder of the tank retained its black paint <br />finish. No holes, dents, tears, or scrapes were observed. Approximately 50 cubic yards of <br />soil were removed from the tank excavation and stockpiled on site. <br />The tank was transported by Erickson Tank Company, under hazardous waste manifest, to <br />the Erickson facility at 255 Parr Avenue in Richmond, California. The tank was <br />subsequently decontaminated and destroyed. Copies of the hazardous waste manifest and <br />the certificate of destruction are attached. <br />Based on the analytical, results (reported below), the excavation was backfilled with pea <br />gravel and paved to match the existing road surface, and the stockpiled soil from around <br />the tank was removed as clean fill by J.T. Paving for use on their yard at 915 East Market <br />Street in Stockton, California. <br />VERIFICATION SAMPLING <br />Based on SJCEHD criteria, one soil sample was collected from each end of the stockpiled <br />soil (#70984W and #70985E), and one soil sample was collected from beneath each end of <br />the tank (#70986W and #70987E). Due to the presence of the water lines near the pump <br />(removed) and service lines (existing) and the relatively short distance from the pump to <br />the tank (approximately 8 feet), Mr. Snavely and Ms. Turkette (SJCEHD) approved <br />Kleinfelder's request that a soil sample not be collected beneath the piping. <br />Soil sample #70984W was collected at a depth of approximately 1.5 feet from the west end <br />of the soil stockpile. Soil sample #70985E was collected at a depth of approximately 1.5 <br />feet from the east end of the soil stockpile. Soil sample #70986W was collected at a depth <br />of approximately 14 feet from the west end of the tank excavation (vent/service end). Soil <br />sample #70987E was collected at a depth of approximately 15 feet from the east end of the <br />tank excavation. The four soil samples consisted of sandy silt. <br />The samples were collected by driving a 6 -inch brass tube into the soil in the stockpile or <br />into the soil collected in the backhoe bucket. Upon removal, each tube was sealed with <br />Teflon sheeting and plastic caps, labeled, logged on a chain -of -custody, and stored in an <br />iced cooler for transport to the analytical laboratory. <br />The samples were transported on April 28, 1992 by courier to Superior Precision <br />Analytical, Inc. (Superior) in Martinez, California. Superior is certified by the State of <br />California for the requested analyses. Each sample was analyzed for purgeable TPH, <br />BTEX, EDB, and total lead. The samples were submitted on a rush turnaround schedule <br />requiring 24 to 48 hours for reporting of analytical results. <br />FR3-92-34 Page 2 of 3 <br />Copyright 1992 Kleinfelder, Inc. <br />KLEINFELDER 3077 Fite Circle, Sacramento, CA 95827 (916) 366-1701 <br />