My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1995-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
3300
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231765
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1995-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 4:16:06 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1995-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231765
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003600
FACILITY_NAME
Nella Oil #427
STREET_NUMBER
3300
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3300 Waterloo Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231765_3300 WATERLOO_1995-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: )-�Z i �% <br />* In Section E below, aescrme now ana when LucZ�c ..�.....I_ -- v .............. <br />E. Comments • %�i r �r1 / t f' ��% - e" �,, f, 7 ,-P <br />1 <br />No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />M <br />No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />O Yes <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />U— /A <br />operational? <br />®-yes <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operat r is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? s, ❑ No. <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />❑ Yes <br />Ngo* <br />�❑ <br />lam" N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention_ valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes* <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />Yes* <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />L3No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />iZ Res <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />_ _ .. .� . . -.._ ___ __••L_ __1_.1 <br />* In Section E below, aescrme now ana when LucZ�c ..�.....I_ -- v .............. <br />E. Comments • %�i r �r1 / t f' ��% - e" �,, f, 7 ,-P <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.