My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4344
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231766
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 3:52:47 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:53:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231766
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003717
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #99840*
STREET_NUMBER
4344
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95215
APN
10102156
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4344 E Waterloo Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231766_4344 E WATERLOO_1997-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
535
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
itoring System Certification <br />Site Address: 4344 WATERLOO RD Date of Testing/Service: 03/16/2004 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 16.01 <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />X Yes <br />No * <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />Q Yes <br />[]No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Q Yes <br />No * <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />RX Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br />interfere with their proper operation? <br />El Yes <br />No ` <br />N/A <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />© Yes <br />❑ No * <br />❑ N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive <br />shut -down? (check all that apply) ❑x Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑x Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑X Yes No <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No * <br />❑x N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical <br />overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating <br />properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes* <br />© No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes* <br />® No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) ❑ Product; <br />❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />© Yes <br />❑ No * <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />® Yes <br />❑ No * <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.