Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 <br />1PC <br />J U L. 14 ,,j Page 2 of? <br />Test Method Developed By: <br />4. TANK ANNULAR TESTIN RONMENTALHEALTH <br />01 Tank Manufacturer [kIndustry Stan ar r Pro ional Engineer <br />Other (Spec) <br />Test Methal Used: <br />Li Pressure =Vacuum ❑Hydrostatic <br />._± Other (Spec) <br />Test Equipment Used: Vac Gauge <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' <br />Tank # Tgpk Sump <br />[j Yes ❑ No <br />Tank # Tank # Tank # <br />1-1 Yes u No [_1 Yes [� No ❑ Yes F1 <br />No <br />Tank Capacity: <br />12,000 <br />Tank Material: <br />Feberglass <br />Tank Manufacturer: <br />Product Stoned: <br />d <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />15 mitt <br />Test Start Time: <br />1200 <br />Initial Reading (Rj): <br />-3PSl <br />Test End Time: <br />100 <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />-3 PSI <br />Test Duration: <br />1 HR <br />Change in Reading (RF-Rj): <br />.0 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />-0.5 PSI <br />Testi Result: <br />JCPass Ci Fail <br />Pass Fail t : Pass I Fail Pass :Fail <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />X Yes a No [INA <br />❑ Yes ❑ No [INA I !Yes IL7 No ❑ NA `l Yes []No <br />i ! NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and Yes 0 No [I NA El Yes C; No 11 NA [_ i Yes ❑ No l NA [-1 Yes ❑ No <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Comments —(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />!,-INA <br />' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />