My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
13889
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545719
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 11:22:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545719
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005335
FACILITY_NAME
CHARLES JACOBS
STREET_NUMBER
13889
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
13889 W HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran,REHS <br /> 9UIN Environmental Health Department ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> �° 600 East Main Street Laurie Cotulla,REHS <br /> Stockton,.California 955202'3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> .� Carl Borgman,REHS- <br /> " Mike Huggins,REHS,RDI <br /> c �- P • Website: wwwsjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio, REHS' <br /> 4tiF°kPhone: (209)468-3420 Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RDI <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> li <br /> August 26, 2008 <br /> Mr. Charles Jacob <br /> PO Box 8820 <br /> Stockton, CA 95208 <br /> i <br /> Subject: Terminous Market RO# 113 <br /> 13889 W. Hwy 12 CUF#: 18115 <br /> Lodi, CA. 95242 Global ID: T0607700170 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) has reviewed Additional <br /> Site Assessment Report (Report) dated- July 31, 2008 prepared by Advanced <br /> GeoEnvironmental (AGE) and has the following comments. <br /> The Report provides results of the additional investigation required by the EHD and includes soil <br /> vapor, soil, and ground water samples collected during February 2008. The Report was <br /> submitted to Geotracker and has some deficiencies. The EHD notified your consultant, AGE <br /> that the report was denied for public review on Geotracker (California State Water Resources <br /> Control Board's internet database) because of the deficiencies. Corrections are to be made and <br /> the report must be re-submitted to Geotracker by September 12, 2008. <br /> ,I <br /> l No contaminants were detected in the five soil vapor probes installed and sampled during this <br /> phase. The findings suggest that the residual petroleum hydrocarbons dissolved in the shallow <br /> ground water and the contaminants adsorbed in the soils from 5 feet and 10 feet below ground <br /> surface ('bgs) are not volatilizing and migrating upward. <br /> The soil, soil vapor, and ground water sample data were evaluated against the San Francisco l+ <br /> I Bay Regional Water Quality'Control Board (SFBRWQCB), Environmental Screening Levels <br /> (ESL). Benzene concentrations inthe sample from boring B6-5 exceeded ESLs for direct <br /> exposure. This indicates that if there was human contact with this soil there may be a health <br /> 1 risk. <br /> Only soil and soil vapor results should be evaluated using the SFBRWQCB-ESLs. The soil <br /> sample results should be evaluated only for direct exposure and gross contamination. When <br /> the ESLs are exceeded, the protection of human health must be addressed. This may be done <br /> by cleaning up the contamination or providing technical justification for allowing it to remain in <br /> place. <br /> Ground water samples collected on February 13, 2008 from MW-5 contained elevated <br /> concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline, (TPHg) and low concentrations of <br /> ! benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). This was the first time this well contained l <br /> r any TPHg or BTEX. More recent sampling events conducted on May 9 and July 16, 2008, <br /> showed that the water samples from MW-5 were again non-detect for the contaminants tested. <br /> r <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.