Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 25 April 2005 <br /> S AGE-NC Project No 00-0696 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' Temperature, pH, and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular intervals for <br /> stabilization using an Oakton water analyzer Field sheets and data are provided in Appendix C <br /> Purged water was containerized in properly labeled,Department of Transportation(DOT)-approved <br />' 55-gallon drums and stored on-site pending proper disposal <br />' 23 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from each well using the disposable bailers after allowing the <br /> wells to achieve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge water volume Each water sample was <br /> transferred into three laboratory-supplied, 40-milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials <br /> containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid solution as a sample preservative, and one 1-liter amber <br /> bottle without preservative After collection, the samples were properly labeled, placed in a chilled <br /> container,and transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories(CTEL), <br /> a State of California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory, for <br /> analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) in accordance with EPA Method 8015M, and <br /> Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and total xylenes(BTEX)and fuel additives methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary-butyl alcohol(TBA), di-isopropyl ether(DIPS), ethyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME), 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB),and 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and flow direction were inferred from field data, hydrocarbon impact to <br /> ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis of the ground water samples <br /> I3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> The elevation of ground water in each of the monitoring wells was calculated by subtracting the <br /> Idepths to ground water from the surveyed relative casing elevations (Table 1) Depths to ground <br /> water ranged from 3 82 feet(MW-4)to 4 97 feet(MW-1)below the tops of the well casings Ground <br /> water elevation at the site ranged from 16 58 feet(MW-2 and MW-4) to 17 29 feet(MW-3) below <br /> mean sea level (MSL), and averaged approximately 16 81 feet below MSL, indicating an increase <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />