Laserfiche WebLink
To: Mr. Mike Quartaroli Page 2 <br /> January 13, 1988 <br /> Peak hour flow rate is assumed to be equal to four times the maximum day flow <br /> rate. Annual quantities of wastewater are based on an average occupancy rate <br /> of 60%. <br /> B. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br /> It is assumed that wastewater treatment will be accomplished with a package <br /> treatment plant. An extended aeration treatment process is frequently used <br /> for small domestic wastewater flows and is considered appropriate for the RV <br /> park. Two manufacturers of extended aeration package treatment plants are <br /> Purestream Inc. and Hydro-Aerobics International Inc. <br /> The package plant would include an aeration basin and a clarifier with return <br /> sludge capabilities. Based on sizing criteria given by Purestream Inc. , the <br /> overall dimensions of the aeration basin and clarifier would be about 12 ft <br /> wide, 28 ft long and 11 ft high. This unit would be suitable for buried or <br /> above grade service. A separate influent pumping station would be needed to <br /> lift the wastewater from the collection system pipelines into the package <br /> plant influent. <br /> Chlorination facilities can be attached to the package treatment plant. How- <br /> ever, regulatory agency requirements_: may call for a high degree of disinfec- <br /> tion, and it may be necessary to have a separate chlorination building and <br /> chlorine contact basin in order to achieve precise control of chlorine feed <br /> rates and sufficient contact time. <br /> Sludge stabilization and handling will be an important consideration. Aerobic <br /> digestion of the sludge is commonly used in conjunction with package plants <br /> and is considered appropriate in this case. The digester volume would be in <br /> the order of 200 cu ft. Blowers would be needed to provide oxygen to the <br /> digester. The same blowers could a-Iso be used to meet the aeration basin <br /> oxygen requirements. <br /> Disposal of sludge could be accomplished by removing the sludge from the diges- <br /> ters and transporting it to a municipal wastewater treatment plant for disposal <br /> one or two times each week (provided that the plant will accept the sludge) . <br /> One alternative would be to use sand drying beds prior to disposal in a land- <br /> fill . Another alternative would be land application of the sludge. Herein, it <br /> is presumed that drying beds will be the most feasible alternative. They would <br /> occupy about 250 sq ft of drying area. Sludge pumps would be needed to trans- <br /> fer the sludge from the digester to the drying beds. The quantity of sludge <br /> generated on the maximum day is estimated to be 150 gal at a solids concentra- <br /> tion of 3%. <br /> Mik <br /> NOLTE and ASSOCIATES <br /> Engineers/Planners/Survevors <br />