Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> r <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: Ton Vorster FROM: Twila Leclerc <br /> Senior Engineer Area Engineer <br /> DATE: 4 June 1990 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: DOLE FRESH FRUIT CO./VICTOR FRUIT GROUND WATER MONITORING PROPOSAL <br /> I have reviewed Dole's response, dated 31 August 1989, prepared by Tenera, to our <br /> comments concerning their groundwater monitoring proposal . Our major concern <br /> regarding this proposal is that existing wells are unlikely to be adequately screened <br /> to represent the first aquifer. There is no evidence presented which shows these wells <br /> meet the objective to represent the uppermost aquifer. A revised proposal must be <br /> submitted to address our questions and concerns. The following numbered comments <br /> correlate to Dole's numbered responses: <br /> 1. The proposed effluent monitoring will include weekly composite samples to be <br /> analyzed for pH, total dissolved solids (TDS) , and conductivity (EC) . Standard <br /> minerals should also be included in the analysis. Instead of analysis of TDS, we <br /> recommend analysis of fixed TDS which only includes mineral content. Samples were <br /> proposed to be taken during the 1990 packing season, 1 March to 1 September. <br /> Since the packing season has already begun, sampling should begin immediately. <br /> We have no objections to Dole's using this data to plan a method for TDS source <br /> control . However, Dole should sample more frequently since wastewater changes <br /> hourly. <br /> 4. Dole' s updated waste discharge requirements should reflect the quantity of <br /> wastewater used to irrigate the vineyard. Dole must measure and submit the <br /> quantity in gallons per day (gpd) of effluent and well water used for irrigation. <br /> 5.a. Dole is planning to abandon the existing, on-site irrigation/monitoring well and <br /> install a new one. The new well is proposed to be closer to the vineyard, and <br /> still downgrad i ent of the ponds and vineyard, which is a better 'location than the <br /> previous well for monitoring purposes. This well should be screened in the <br /> uppermost water-bearing zone based on lithology encountered so samples can be <br /> taken of the shallow ground water. <br /> 5.e. The proposed monitoring well sampling procedure discusses the wells to be sampled, <br /> but not the sampling technique. A detailed sampling technique and protocol need <br /> to be included in the revised proposal . <br /> 5.f. The wells proposed to be used in the ground water monitoring program can be <br /> sampled for TDS. However, before we can accept these wells as part of the ground <br /> water monitoring program, Dole must show with detailed well logs that samples from <br /> these wells can adequately represent the water quality from the uppermost water- <br /> bearing zone or shallow aquifer. It is unlikely that these wells only screen the <br /> shallow ground water, in which case new monitoring wells will have to be <br /> installed. If the direction of local ground water is not consistent with the <br /> regional maps, additional wells may have to be installed. <br />