Laserfiche WebLink
FLUOR DANIEL GTI <br /> s <br /> were drilled out using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with 8-to 10-inch-diameter hollow-stem augers <br /> Following removal of the well casings and sand annulus, each boring was grouted to within 6 inches of the <br /> surface with Portland cement The cement was pumped through tremie pipe installed to total depth of the <br /> boring to allow for proper settling of the grout Each boring location was topped with hot patch asphalt to <br /> match the existing grade <br /> On-site groundwater monitoring wells MW-7, MW-9, and PW-1, and off-site wells PW-2, MW-5, MW-8, <br /> MW-10, MW-11, MW-13, MW-14, MW-15A through MW-1513, MW-16, MW-18, and MW-19 were destroyed <br /> using pressure grouting techniques Portland cement was pumped through tremie pipe installed to total <br /> depth of the well Following grouting, 30 psi of air pressure was applied to the top of each casing to push <br /> the cement through the screened interval Air pressure was applied at 5 minute intervals and repeated <br /> three times to monitor the drop of grout inside the casing Following pressure grouting, the top 3 feet of well <br /> casing and annulus material in each boring was drilled out or excavated Additional cement was used to fill <br /> the resulting hole to approximately 6 inches below grade and topped with hot patch asphalt or native soil to <br /> match the existing grade Off-site well MW-12 was drilled out to total depth and grouted due to a <br /> submersible pump lodged In the well casing at approximately 23 feet below surface grade <br /> The two groundwater extraction wells RW-1 and PW-3, constructed of 12-inch- and 10-inch-diameter low <br /> grade carbon steel, respectively, were destroyed by perforating or ripping the well casing The casings <br /> were then grouted with Portland cement pumped through tremie pipe Hot patch asphalt and black-dye <br /> concrete was used at the surface to match existing grade Grouting of the borings was observed by <br /> Ms Mary Meays and Mr Harlin Knoll of the SJCPHS Field notes are included as Attachment 3 <br /> Waste Disposal <br /> All well-related materials, including well casings, well boxes vaults, and associated concrete were <br /> segregated from the well annulus material and the segregated materials were placed in two 20-yard bins <br /> located on site Approximately 15 cubic yards of soil was generated from the well destruction activities <br /> Two discrete soil samples were collected from the soil bin on November 7, 1996 The samples were <br /> collected in 6-inch brass sleeves sealed, labeled, and placed on ice in an insulated cooler for transport <br /> under proper chain-of-custody manifest to Western Environmental Science & Technology (WEST) in Davis, <br /> California for analysis The two samples were combined in the laboratory into one composite sample and <br /> analyzed for benzene toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE), and <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons-as-gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA methods 8020/8015 total lead by EPA method <br /> 6010, and Waste Extraction Test (WET) for lead by EPA method 7421 The composite sample did not <br /> 023Dwdes 4rf5tN 5 11 <br /> t <br /> Summary of Well Destruction December 17 1996 <br /> The Southland Corporation 9110 Thornton Road Stockton CA 2 <br />