Laserfiche WebLink
Report of Secondary Investigation - 3 <br /> Prepared for Barbara Drake,26485 Thornton Rd ,Thornton,CA May 4, 1995 <br /> 32 Wellhead Surveying/Groundwater Gradient <br /> On January 31, 1995, monitoring wells MWs-1, 2 and 3 were professionally surveyed to top of casing <br /> and top of well-box nms relative to mean sea level (Appendix A) The wellhead survey was conducted <br /> by Morrow Surveying of Sacramento Elevations were based on USGS Benchmark P 463 <br /> Wellhead elevations were combined with groundwater monitoring data collected in past quarters by <br /> Wallace-Kuhl to determine the groundwater flow direction beneath the site Table 1 shows the <br /> calculated groundwater elevations for the site based on groundwater monitoring collected by <br /> Wallace-Kuhl Based on the calculated groundwater elevations,the groundwater flow direction is to the <br /> north and northwest at a hydraulic gradient ranging from 0 001 to 0 01 ft/ft <br /> 33 Site Reconnaissance <br /> On February 9, 1995, Groundwater Technology personnel visited the site to perform general <br /> reconnaissance of site conditions and to mark the locations of the proposed soil/groundwater sampling <br /> locations During the site visit a map of site layout was prepared, photographs were taken of the <br /> current site condition,special conditions/obstructions to the proposed field work were also noted In <br /> addition, proposed boring locations were outlined in white paint to denote utility clearance areas for <br /> Underground Service Alert(USA) <br /> 34 Rationale for Soil/Groundwater Sampling Locations <br /> Based upon the results of the background review and the groundwater flow direction, Groundwater <br /> Technology specified ten locations for soil and groundwater sampling (131 through B10, Figure 2) The <br /> objective of soil and groundwater sampling was to further define the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil and groundwater identified during the installation of MWs-1 through 3 131 was positioned directly <br /> downgradient of MW-3 to determine the extent of dissolved hydrocarbons in groundwater to the north <br /> B2 and B10, located east of MW-2, were used to define the eastern boundary of hydrocarbon- <br /> impacted groundwater 33 and B5 were drilled to investigate groundwater quality south of the former <br /> UST pit B4 was drilled to more precisely identify the western boundary of hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> and groundwater B6 was located between MW-3 and the former UST pit to identify the source of <br /> dissolved hydrocarbons in MW-3 B7 was positioned in the northwest portion of the site to investigate <br /> the quality of groundwater west of MW-3 and downgradient of the former UST pit B8 and B9 were <br /> located downgradient of MW-2 for further definition of the northern and northeastern boundary of <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted soil and groundwater downgradient of the former pump islands <br /> 3,5 Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan <br /> Following a complete review of site conditions, Groundwater Technology prepared a site-specific <br /> Health and Safety Plan as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) <br /> i <br /> W53EAR RPT <br /> ❑❑li GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑❑❑ TECHNOLOGY <br />