Laserfiche WebLink
Pesticide Rinse Water Disposal Sites -6- <br /> with assuming the waste is hazardous is that insurance costs and permit <br /> fees for hazardous waste generators and treaters are prohibitively high <br /> for the applicators . The California Department of Health Services <br /> (DHS) is evaluating regulatory program modifications that may resolve <br /> this problem. <br /> B. Some applicators have been able to eliminate the production of rinse <br /> water by field rinsing tanks, wiping the exterior of equipment with <br /> rags, and disposing of rags at a Class I facility. As long as field <br /> rinsing complies with -pesticide application requirements of the <br /> appropriate County Agricultural Commissioner, such a management program <br /> is acceptable to Regional Board staff. The burning of wipe rags (and <br /> bags and plastic bottles used as pesticide containers) at applicator <br /> sites is not acceptable unless it is demonstrated that such disposal <br /> complies with regulations administered by the. Regional Board and other <br /> regulatory agencies. <br /> With respect to conclusion 2. , the following observations are made: <br /> A. Evaluation of pesticide residues at rinse water disposal sites requires <br /> careful selection of sampling sites , proper sample collection and <br /> handling, correct choice of analytical procedures, and knowledgeable <br /> review of analytical results. It is beyond the ability of most opera- <br /> tors to conduct a complete sampling program on their own, and most <br /> operators should select a consultant capable of characterizing a <br /> disposal site. Whether the evaluation be done by the operator or a <br /> consultant, a sampling program should be submitted to Regional Board <br /> staff for review prior to implementatibn. The sampling program should <br /> explain the rationale behind site selection, detail sample collection <br /> methodology, justify the analytical tests selected, and describe a <br /> quality control program to evaluate the adequacy of the laboratory <br /> work. <br /> B. For protection of water quality, those pesticides most likely to <br /> migrate should be included in the analytical scheme. The "standard" <br /> pesticide scans offered by analytical laboratories are not adequate at <br /> many sites. The Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act (Article 15, <br /> Chapter 2, Division 7 of the Food and Agricultural Code) was introduced <br /> as Assembly Bili (AB) 2021 and approved by the Governor 30 September <br /> 1985. The Act requires the State Department of Food and Agriculture to <br /> establish criteria to evaluate the potential for a pesticide to impact <br /> ground water, and to establish a list of pesticides that have the <br /> potential to pollute ground water. Although the list will not be <br /> available until December 1987, the information developed under the Act <br /> should be considered in selecting analytical schemes at old rinse <br /> water disposal sites. <br /> ji � l C� A <br /> C; - ;-- <br /> L_. <br />