Laserfiche WebLink
' 18 July 2002 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 96-0254 <br />' Page 3 of 17 <br /> 2 4 UST REMOVAL <br />' AGE was informed that three USTs, dispensers and piping i were removed from the site on 31 July <br /> P <br /> 1991, and that the removal was witnessed by a representative of the EHD, additional information <br /> regarding history of the UST use, tank tests, product inventory and repairs are not known to AGE <br /> Six soil samples were collected from the sidewalls during the 31 July 1991 excavation, at a depth <br /> of five feet below surface grade (bsg), no excavation floor samples were collected because <br /> groundwater was encountered in the excavation at a depth of approximately six feet In addition,one <br />' grab groundwater sample was collected from the excavation and one soil sample was collected <br /> beneath the piping/dispenser area The soil and ground water samples were analyzed for TPH-g, <br /> BTEX, Iead and ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br /> IConcentrations of TPH-g and BTEX compounds were detected in each soil sample collected from <br /> the UST excavation TPH-g was detected from the east wall of the UST excavation at a maximum <br /> concentration of 62 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)and from the west wall of the UST excavation <br /> at a maximum concentration of 26 mg/kg Benzene was not detected above the elevated detection <br /> limits in the soil samples collected from the UST excavation walls Lead was detected at a maximum <br /> . concentration of 10 mg/kg EDB was detected in one sample at a concentration of 2 9 mg/kg <br /> TPH-g and BTEX compounds were detected in the water sample at concentrations of <br /> 150,000 micrograms per liter (gg/l) and 25,000 gg/l, 43,000 µg/l, 5,700 µg/1 and 32,000 µg/l, <br /> respectively Lead was detected at a concentration of 0 67 µg/1 in the water sample,however, EDB <br /> was not detected <br /> I3.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER <br /> On 24 June 1997, a total of nine soil probe borings(B 1 through B9)were advanced at the site under <br />' EHD oversight Probe borings were advanced in the area of the farmer USTs,and northward towards <br /> the property line(Figure 2) Soil in probe borings BI through B5 were continuously sampled(cored), <br /> whereas soil in probe boring B6 was sampled at the vadose zone/ground water interface In addition, <br /> I grab ground water samples were collected from B 1 through 139 The grab ground water samples and <br /> selected soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX and methyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE), <br /> however, soil samples collected from probe boring B1 were not analyzed, because field screening <br /> with a organic vapor monitor (OVM) indicated that the samples were not impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons <br /> • TPH-g was detected in six soil samples collected from four of the probe borings,B2,B3,B4 <br /> and B5 TPH-g was detected at concentrations as high as 5,000 mg/kg (B5-6') at depths of <br /> 8 feet bsg or less TPH-g concentrations detected in soil from depths greater than 8 feet bsg <br /> Iadvanced GeoEnvsronmental,Inc <br /> I <br />