My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNER
>
1
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545764
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2020 9:53:17 AM
Creation date
6/9/2020 9:45:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545764
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005330
FACILITY_NAME
ISC WINES OF CALIFORNIA INC
STREET_NUMBER
1
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
TURNER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95424
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1 W TURNER RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Water Resources Control Board <br /> August 9 , 1991 <br /> Page 2 <br /> I <br /> left the contamination in place and not tried to clean up <br /> the problem . Rewards should be given to .taxpayers that take <br /> the bull by the horns and bulldog a clean up into submission <br /> and not allocations of more cost and penalties . Most of <br /> these problems stem from leaks over a very long period of <br /> time . Some are a direct result of practices prior to 1984 <br /> that were perfectly legal and accepted . ' it seems to us , the <br /> most important factor should be a clean environment as <br /> quickly and economically at; possible . These charges do not <br /> lend themselves to that end . Our contention is the fee for <br /> project management should never have been allowed to be over <br /> $500 .00 and the limit should apply in all cases retroactive <br /> to the start of the Pilot Program . <br /> The following information is submitted with this petition in <br /> accordance with Paragraph 2 ( B ) of the procedures to <br /> petition . ( Copy enclosed . ) <br /> B ( 1 ) Petitioners- <br /> Ford Construction ,Company , Inc . <br /> Jim Thorpe Oil , Inc. <br /> 639 E . Lockeford St <br /> Lodi , CA 95240 <br /> ( 2 ) Billing of "program management fees" that amount to <br /> a 420% overhead fee charged to site specific costs . <br /> ( 3 ) Original billing by letter of May 8 , 1992 . This <br /> billing was contested by our letter of June 4 , 1991 . <br /> This petition is filed in accordance with your <br /> letter of July 12 , 1991 . <br /> ( 4 ) It is inappropriate to allocate '"program management <br /> costs to individual sites when that allocation <br /> results in an overhead fee of 420% . This amounts to <br /> a change of over $134 .00 per hour for site <br /> inspection of "review" time . <br /> ( 5 ) Overbilling , Refer to ( 4 ) above . <br /> ( 6 ) A reasonable method of allocating cost to cleanup <br /> sites . It should not cost $134 .00 per hour for <br /> "review" time . <br /> ( 7 ) It apparently is not appropriate to attempt to <br /> allocate all program costs against site clean up . <br /> If the administrative fee charged individual sites <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.