My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012641
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNER
>
4614
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545770
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2020 10:59:14 PM
Creation date
6/9/2020 2:05:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012641
RECORD_ID
PR0545770
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006278
FACILITY_NAME
WOODBRIDGE VINEYARD ASSOC
STREET_NUMBER
4614
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
TURNER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4614 W TURNER RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
organic material. Treatment plant effluent water would be piped to the <br /> trench and dispersed through a 4-inch diameter, slotted, steel pipe over <br /> the entire length of the trench. Pipe slotting would be oriented toward <br /> the top of the pipe, to allow the pipe to fill completely, therefore <br /> assuring equal distribution of treated water over the length of the <br /> trench. <br /> The proposed infilrration gallery area would be located under a concrete <br /> slab which will become a trucking lane as part of Sebastiani's expansion <br /> plans for the Woodbridge Cellars facility. Provisions for trench access <br /> for repair and maintenance will be included in final design plans. <br /> Groundwater Recharge Wells <br /> In the event that groundwater recharge by infiltration trenching does not <br /> adequately accommodate the treatment plant effluent, operation of <br /> groundwater recharge wells may be a feasible alternative for groundwater <br /> recharge. Recharge wells could operate in conjunction with the <br /> infiltration gallery to augment the groundwater system recharge or could <br /> operate separately as a groundwater recharge alternative. <br /> Recharge well design could require that deeper aquifer units be utilized <br /> for groundwater recharge. This would result in a need for additional <br /> investigative drilling and characterization of the hydraulic properties. <br /> of lower aquifer units to establish their potential recharge rates. Due <br /> to available space constraints within the site facilities, a potential <br /> recharge well field would most likely be located approximately 400 to <br /> 500 feet south of the proposed groundwater treatment system. Recharge in <br /> this area would not result in any adverse impacts on groundwater controls <br /> established by the downgradient groundwater extraction system. <br /> PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS <br /> The San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District requires permitting <br /> for in-situ soil venting of VOCs under Rule 409.9. This rule requires <br /> that the soil venting system operate at a 90% control rate. As previously <br /> stated, the proposed soil venting system will operate well within the rule <br /> requirements. A minimum period of approximately eight weeks will be <br /> required by the District to process the permit application, during which <br /> time the District will conduct risk assessment screening to confirm that <br /> the proposed system control rate is adequate. <br /> A permit to operate a volatile organic compound air stripping tower will <br /> be required for the groundwater treatment system. The permit is require? <br /> under SJCAPCD Rule 209.1. This rule requires Best Available Control <br /> Technology (BACT) be provided for an airstripper treatment system. <br /> ----- -- - - -- - -----However-,--the--SJCAPCD-has-indicated-in- telephone..communications_-_that VOC <br /> air emissions of less than 5 pounds per day may be considered the <br /> equivalent of BACT. Since, as previously shown, air emissions from the <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.