Laserfiche WebLink
Comfort Air • <br /> 1607 Turnpike Road, Stockton October 2013 <br /> Claim No: 15533 <br /> ATTACHMENT 1: COMP JANCE WITH STATE WATER BOARD POLICIES AND STATE LAW <br /> The case complies with thi State Water Resources Control Board policies and state law. Section <br /> 25296.10 of the Health an Safety Code requires that sites be cleaned up to protect human health, <br /> safety, and the environmei t. Based on available information, any residual petroleum constituents <br /> at the Site do not pose sigi ificant risk to human health, safety, or the environment. <br /> The case complies with the requirements of the Low-Threat Underground Storage Tank <br /> (UST) Case Closure Policy as described below.' <br /> FSafety <br /> ve action consistent with Chapter 6.7 of the Health and Safety Fs7 <br /> implementing egulations? <br /> ive action provi ions contained in Chapter 6.7 of the Health and <br /> e and the imple enting regulations govern the entire corrective <br /> ess at leaking T sites. If it is determined, at any stage in the <br /> ction process, t iat UST site closure is appropriate, further <br /> compliance with corrective action requirements is not necessary. Corrective <br /> action at this site has been consistent with Chapter 6.7 of the Health and <br /> Safety Code and implemer ing regulations and, since this case meets <br /> applicable case-closure rec uirements, further corrective action is not <br /> necessary, unless the actio ty is necessary for case closure. <br /> Have waste discharge rec uirements or any other orders issued pursuant ❑ Yes O No <br /> to Division 7 of the Water Code been issued at this case? <br /> If so, was the corrective action performed consistent with any order? ❑ Yes ❑ No O NA <br /> General Criteria <br /> General criteria that must be satisfied by all candidate sites: <br /> Is the unauthorized release located within the service area of a public ® Yes ❑ No <br /> water system? <br /> Does the unauthorized release consist only of petroleum? © Yes ❑ No <br /> Has the unauthorized ("primary") release from the UST system been 0-Yes El No <br /> stopped? <br /> Has free product been removed to the maximum extent practicable? r).. <br /> Yes ❑ No Lt}'NA <br /> Has a conceptual site model that assesses the nature, extent, and <br /> mobility of the release been developed? ❑x Yes ❑ No <br /> Refer to the Low-Threat Underground Storage Tank Case Closure Policy for closure criteria for low-threat <br /> petroleum UST sites. <br /> http://www.waterboards.ca.go lboard decisions/adopted orders/resolutions/2012/rs2012 0016atta. df <br /> Page 3 of 13 <br />