Laserfiche WebLink
t18 January 2004 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 95-0141 <br /> tPage 2 of 5 <br /> t Temperature,pH and conductivity of purged ground water were measured at regular purge intervals <br /> using an Oakton water analyzer The field data and field sheets are included in Appendix B Purged <br /> water was temporarily stored on-site in 5 5-gallon DOT-approved H-17 storage drums pending proper <br /> disposal' ' <br />' 2 12 Ground Water Sample Collection and Analysis <br /> Prior to the collection of ground water samples, the depth to ground water was re-measured in each <br />' well to ensure that a minimum of 80% of the initial water volume had recharged A water sample <br /> was'then collected from each well using a new, dedicated, disposable plastic bailer Immediately <br /> . upon retrieval, the sample was transferred into three properly labeled 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile <br />' organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The <br /> samples were Iogged on a chain-of-custody form,stored in a chilled container and transported under <br /> cham-of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California Department of <br />' Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory, The ground water samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> • Method 8015 Modified, <br />' Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tentary-butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8021, and <br />' • Di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), MTBE, tertiary-amyl methyl <br /> ether(TAME),tertiary-butyl alcohol(TBA), 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB), 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected and <br />' the contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the laboratory analytical data collected <br /> on 24 September 2003 <br /> 1 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br />' At the time of the September 2003 monitoring event,depths to ground water ranged from'21 11 feet <br /> to 22 16 feet below the tops of the well casings (btoc) Ground water elevations at the site ranged <br /> from 13 76 feet below mean sea level (MSL) in well MW-l0A to 14 54 feet below MSL in well <br /> MW-11B (Table 1) The tops of the well, screens in MW-3 and MW-5 were drowned by <br /> approximately 7 to 8 feet <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,[Fie <br />