Laserfiche WebLink
Alaniz, John [EHD] <br />From: Chelsea Bossenbroek <cbossenbroek@northgateholdings.com> <br />Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 8:45 AM <br />To: Alaniz, John [EHD] <br />Cc: Dominique Maingot <br />Subject: Re: HW inspection 14900 W HWY 12 <br />Attachments: 070720 Manifest 007440624SKS.pdf; 032520 Manifest 007439819SKS.pdf; 040220 <br />Manifest 007314685SKS.pdf; 031820 Manifest 014788830FLE.pdf; IMG_7690.JPG; IMG_ <br />7684.) PG <br />CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the <br />sender and know the content is safe. <br />Hi John, <br />Please see below responses to your additional questions: <br />Violation 102: A determination needs to be made for the black and white 55 gallon drums. Why <br />wouldn't Safety-Kleen sample them? <br />We reached out to Safety-Kleen to inquire about them sampling the charred wood from the fire. They said they <br />couldn't test us and advised us to throw it away. For obvious reasons, we didn't want to do that. I reached out to <br />the contractor who did the demolition of the building following the fire last year and they said those containers <br />were not theirs and they didn't know where they came from. The prior general manager recalls that when the <br />fire happened, employees swept up the charred lumber from the fire and placed it in those containers. I've <br />attached photos of the contents of those containers. I'm not sure how we should proceed from here. <br />Violation 114: I need TSDF signed copies of manifests 014788835FLE and 007439819SKS <br />- Are you able to clarify where the 014788835FLE number for the manifest came from? It doesn't match <br />anything in our files; Clean Harbors doesn't have a copy either. We are wondering if you <br />meant 014788830FLE? That one is on file in Dropbox and appears to be complete. I've also attached a copy of <br />the manifest ending in 30 here. <br />- The fully signed version of the 007439819SKS is attached here and uploaded in Dropbox. <br />Violation 502: The tank assessment was incomplete. Several items such as the remaining service life of <br />the tank secondary containment calculations were not seen on the assessment. <br />Based on this comment below, please see the following italicized statement: <br />If the facility has had all of the waste hauled off site and is now a small generator, then I will be able to close <br />the tank assessment violation without any further action required. I need a statement saying the facility is now a <br />small generator and will continue to function as one. <br />