Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC-HEALTH ERVICES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUN Y '; ?, <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M.D., M.P.H., Acting Health OfficerR <br /> 445 N. San Joaquin Street • P.O. Box 388 • Stockton, CA 95201-0388 �ifioRe� <br /> (209) 468-3420 <br /> JOHN DIECKMAN EXECUTOR (D PY <br /> MCCALLISTER TRUST <br /> 500 AIRPORT BLVD STE 200 MAR 2 4 1994 <br /> BURLINGAME CA 94010 <br /> RE: System 99 SITE CODE: 1275 <br /> 601 South Ventura <br /> Stockton, CA 95203 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) has completed <br /> review of the "Soil Excavation Report" March 4, 1994 and F repared by RESNA. PHS/EHD has the <br /> following comments for your consideration. <br /> Soil <br /> The excavation commenced on November 8, 1993 and removed approximately 1,500 cubic yards of <br /> contaminated soil. The soil excavation appeared to have a ectively removed the contaminated soil as <br /> evidenced in the results of the November 12, 1993 confirmation sampling of the excavation which did not <br /> detected any contaminants. <br /> The soil removed from the excavation was stockpiled on sit and was underlain and overlain by plastic. <br /> Soil contamination was detected up to 420,000 ppb T?H-ga 5 and 7,500 ppb xylene during initial sampling <br /> which occurred on November 23, 1993. The report include a proposal to treat the contaminated soil by <br /> aeration. Please contact the San Joaquin Valley Unified A r Pollution Control District for information <br /> regarding obtaining a permit to aerate the soil. Furthermo e, during a recent conversation, March 15, <br /> 1994,with John Lane of RESNA, he indicated that the soil may be biologically treated by stimulating the <br /> indigenous microbial population by the addition of nutrients. Please submit a final description of the <br /> treatment method which will be used.. <br /> The proposed confirmation soil sampling plan included in the report will not be adequate to verify the <br /> effectiveness of the soil treatment. A total of 30 discrete sc it samples (1 per 50 cubic yards) will be <br /> required. The additional samples are requested primarily b=use of the shallow depth to groundwater at <br /> the site. Any contaminants which are placed into the excav ition will likely overtime leach into the <br /> groundwater. The required frequency of sampling also refl cted a reduction of the number of samples that <br /> was originally requested due to the volume of soil excavate(. <br /> Since the site is located within the City of Stockton bounda 'es, it will be necessary to secure a grading <br /> permit from the City of Stockton Building Division prior tc backfilling the excavation. <br /> Groundwater <br /> The groundwater sample collected on November 12, 1994 om the water which seeped into the excavation <br /> did however, detect contamination of up to 3,100 ppb TPH gas and 7.5 ppb benzene. <br /> The report and supporting correspondence to the City of S ockton, dated March 11, 1994, indicated that <br /> between 20,000 gallons and 60,000 gallons will be extracted from the excavation and possibly transported <br /> to the Municipal Utilities Waste Water Treatment Facility. Please continue to keep PHS/EHD updated <br /> on the status of the proposed extraction and disposal. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County H afth Care Service. <br />