Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW2, MW3, MW4, and from groundwater <br /> in the excavation pit using dedicated disposable bailers The samples were placed immediately <br /> on ice and transported to Argon Mobile Labs (DHS Cert #1873) and analyzed for benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), TPHg and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br /> (TPHd) using EPA methods 8015/8020 No petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were <br /> detected in any sample Groundwater analytical results are summarized on Table 2 <br /> Laboratory data with chain of custody documentation are included as Attachment 2. <br /> SOIL PILE SAMPLING <br /> The stockpiled soil was resampled on September 26, 1994 A RESNA technician collected 30 <br /> discrete soil samples, one for every 50 cubic yards of soil, in accordance with San Joaquin <br /> County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) correspondence <br /> dated March 24, 1994. The samples were collected a minimum of two feet below the surface <br /> of the soil pile into prewashed brass tubes, capped with Teflon tape and plastic end caps and <br /> transported on ice, under chain of custody, to Argon Mobile Labs Samples were analyzed for <br /> TPHd, TPHg, and BTEX No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in any samples Soil <br /> sample locations are shown on Plate 3 Analytical results are summarized in Table 3 <br /> . Laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Attachment 3 <br /> DESTRUCTION OF MONITORING WELL MW1 <br /> As discussed in RESNA correspondence dated August 31, 1994, monitoring well MW1 was <br /> destroyed as a result of unstable side walls to the excavation pit Although a portion of the <br /> broken well casing can be seen lying across the floor of the pit, the intact well remnant is not <br /> visible above the pit floor The well remnant has been covered with dirt and mud from the <br /> excavation side walls and is no longer accessible. RESNA has maintained that this well <br /> remnant poses no threat as a potential conduit for vertical transport of contaminants All <br /> portions of the well from ground surface to approximately 15 to 18 feet below grade have been <br /> destroyed by caving into the excavation Groundwater currently exists at approximately 15 <br /> feet below grade The entire well remnant exists within the saturated zone and there will be no <br /> conduit from the surface after backfilling has occurred Furthermore, two rounds of <br /> groundwater samples collected from the excavation pit contained no detectable hydrocarbons, <br /> indicating that replacement of this well is not warranted <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon analytical results of groundwater samples collected from the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells and two rounds of samples collected from the open excavation, it appears <br /> 1500591SR102794 doc 2 <br />