My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
2801
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009016
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2020 1:25:11 PM
Creation date
6/17/2020 11:32:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009016
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0004032
FACILITY_NAME
AMERICAN MOULDING & MILLWORK (FRMR)
STREET_NUMBER
2801
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11709001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2801 WEST LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
American <br /> Moulding&Millwork <br /> Company <br /> May 10, 1989 <br /> Page 2 <br /> downgradient well until nearly 12 years after discharge . <br /> Because of the slow groundwater velocity, the location of <br /> existing monitoring wells, the uncertainty regarding the <br /> date on which the diesel and waste oil tanks began to <br /> leak, and the failure of Dames & Moore to conduct <br /> groundwater sampling in the vicinity of these tanks, it <br /> cannot be reliably concluded that groundwater at the site <br /> has not been impacted by those discharges . While Dames & <br /> Moore cites the danger of inadvertent contamination of <br /> groundwater as the basis for not locating a monitoring <br /> well in an area containing contaminated soil, such wells <br /> are regularly installed at sites throughout California <br /> without adverse effect . Your own comments on the proposed <br /> plan notes this deficiency in the site investigation, yet <br /> nothing was ever done to correct it . <br /> The proposed remedial action plan is also inadequate <br /> because it fails to address known PCP contamination at the <br /> site . This oversight is neither explained nor justified <br /> in the plan. <br /> We are most concerned that the proposed remediation has <br /> apparently been approved by your office, at least on a <br /> tentative basis, without any input from AMMC or other <br /> members of the public . As you know, the property is <br /> identified in the Hazardous Substance Account Bond Act <br /> Expenditure Plan. Accordingly, very specific statutory <br /> safeguards apply to the Remedial Action Plan development <br /> and approval process . See Health & Safety Code § 25356 . 1 . <br /> Among these safeguards is public review and comment on the <br /> proposed plan prior to approval . At the very least, we <br /> must be given an opportunity to express our concerns and <br /> to obtain an explanation of the District ' s rationale for <br /> approving the plan. Given the facts, we also believe that <br /> the State Department of Health Services and the Central <br /> Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board would have to <br /> approve any cleanup level even approaching the one <br /> suggested by Dames & Moore . <br /> As the present owner of the property, no one is more <br /> interested in expediting cleanup of the site than AMMC. <br /> However, any cleanup must fully address all contamination <br /> at the site and ensure that human health and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.