Laserfiche WebLink
0L,,29 93 09:48 _%2916 366 7013 aA, KKffiLviu <br /> 40`+I+ <br /> require an excavation and grading permit, the bum pit area and the teepee area now warrant a <br /> remedial work plan and the teepee area is adjacent to the trench, it seems prudent to include <br /> the trench work in a common remedial work plan with the other sites. <br /> I $cooe of Work <br /> Task 1: Work Flan and Permitting <br /> Kleinfelder will prepare a remedial work plan addressing the removal of impacted soil, <br /> removal verification soil sampling, stockpile , sampling, and potential avenues for the <br /> disposition of impacted soil depending on the results of the stockpile samples. In addition, <br /> Kleinfelder will prepare ;he applications for environmental work plan review and excavation <br /> and grading permit. The: applications will be submitted to AMM for the required signatures <br /> and submittal to the County. <br /> Task 2: Soil Excavation <br /> Task 2A: Burn Pit Area <br /> Based on the limited assessment, Kleinfelder will assume for estimating purposes that an <br /> approximately 400 square foot area to a depth of approximately 15 feet will need to be <br /> excavated. This estimate is based on the limited vertical migration indicated by the three <br /> samples from bolting B-2 and the assumption that lateral migration beyond the burn pit has not <br /> occurred. The data from B-2 indicates that the top 7 feet (approximately 150 cubic yards) may <br /> not be impacted and shoald therefore be stockpiled and sampled separately from the bottom 8 <br /> feet (approximattly 175 cubic yards). Upon excavation, the soil will be placed directly in bins <br /> provided by AMM. Whim each bin is full, the AMM supplied and operated forklift will be <br /> used to deposit the soil in the proper stockpile. Based on the potential depth (15 feet), the <br /> quantity of soil to be moved (approximately 325 cubic yards), and the unconsolidated soil <br /> around the burn pit, Kleinfelder recommends excavating the soil with an excavator (verses a <br /> backhoe). The excavator has a longer reach which will allow it to be further from the <br /> excavation and still reach the anticipated depth. This should reduce the potential for the <br /> unconsolidated sediments to lose lateral support. In addition, the larger bucket should increase <br /> productivity. Although the excavator costs approximately 40 percent more than the backhoe <br /> on a per yard basis, site !Fafety and increased productivity should reduce the impact to the total <br /> project cost. <br /> Task 211: Trench Area <br /> While on site for the bum pit area remediation, soil potentially impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons at the drainage ditch (trench) will be removed. Based on the assumptions that <br /> the trench is approximately 15 feet wide and approximately 75 feet long, and that only 1 foot <br /> of soil will need to be removed from the trench, approximately 60 cubic yards of soil will be <br /> excavated. In addition, adjacent to the drain, approximately I cubic yard of material will be <br /> removed. The soil from ;he drain and trench will be stockpiled at the teepee area. <br /> Task 2C: Teepee Area <br /> Upon removal of the trench area stockpile from the teepee area, an additional approximately <br /> 6 inches of soil/debris will be removed. Assuming a 20 foot radius, approximately 6 cubic <br /> yards of material will be added to the soil being disposed. <br /> FHB-92-222 Page 2 of 7 24 220182-800 <br /> C,,r At 4992 Kleinfelder, hie, <br />