Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 THE DESIGNATED LEVEL METHODOLOGY <br /> Existing California regulations dearly define how wastes are to be classified; and detailed <br /> guidance is provided for the implementing agencies to set all but one of the boundaries <br /> between the five major waste classes (see Figure 1) The one significant boundary not <br /> clearly delineated is the lower end of the 'designated waste' classification. Wastes above <br /> this boundary— 'designated wastes' and 'hazardous wastes'—have the potential to <br /> significantly degrade water quality and must be discharged to waste management units <br /> (Class H and Class I) which isolate them from the surrounding environment(see Figure 2). <br /> Wastes below this boundary— 'nonhazardous solid wastes'and 'inert wastes' may be <br /> discharged to units (Class III and unclassified) that do not provide this isolation. Thus, <br /> failure to classify a waste as 'designated'or 'hazardous' permits its discharge to waste <br /> management units that have little or no natural or engineered controls to prevent the <br /> release of waste constituents to the environment(most Class III and unclassified units are <br /> not required to have liners nor leachate collection and removal systems). <br /> How are the regulatory agencies and the regulated community to determine whether a <br /> waste discharged to one of these waste management units poses a threat to beneficial uses <br /> of water? The following discussion presents a methodology which may be used to <br /> determine whether a waste has the potential to degrade water quality if discharged to a <br /> waste management unit that provides less than Class II containment The methodology <br /> defines the lower boundary of the 'designated waste' classification (as well as the criteria <br /> which may be used to grant §2520(x)(1)variances under Subchapter 15)by establishing <br /> "Designated Levels" (see Figure 1). These levels are concentrations of waste constituents <br /> above which a waste is presumed to pose a threat to water quality at the site being <br /> considered. Designated Levels are derived from numerical "water quality goals",limits or <br /> levels of water quality constituents which are established to protect the beneficial uses of <br /> water. Wastes whose constituent concentrations exceed the sif& p dffic Designated Levels <br /> T should be classified as`designated wastes' with-respect_to that site, and-the site <br /> should-be-required to provide Class H containment under Subchapter 15. <br /> r <br /> IThe Designated bevel Methodology is adapted from a procedure used by DHS to calculate`hazardous' <br /> STLCs and MCs from dnnlung water standards,which is presented in the document"Final Statement of <br /> Reasons for Proposed Regulations,'Criteria for Identification of Hazardous and Extremely Hazardous <br /> Wastes"'in Title 22(CAM SOR),adopted by DHS in February 1984.31 <br /> t <br /> 3.1 Determining Available Concentrations of Waste Constituents <br /> ' In order to determine the threat posed to water quality by a particular waste it is first <br /> necessary to ascertain the quantity of each constituent of concern in the waste that is <br /> available to migrate to waters of the State. <br /> 3.1.1 Liquid Wastes <br /> The quantity of chemical constituents that is available to migrate from liquid wastes is . <br /> dependent on the expected migration route. Only the dissolved concentrations of waste <br /> Designated Level Methodology Page 19 <br />