Laserfiche WebLink
• No state or federal water quality goal has been developed for naphthalene, therefore <br /> the analytical detection limit was used, <br /> • The environmental attenuation factors for the Site are above average because of the <br /> low infiltration asphalt paved surface, the fine-textured soils, and the depth to <br /> groundwater of 56 feet bgs, <br /> • The environmental attenuation factor for TPH-d was estimated to be above average <br /> because of its low water solubility (high LF), and the sharp reduction in TPH-d <br /> concentration with depth, <br /> • The environmental attenuation factors for napthalene and other semivolatile <br /> constituents reported in soils were estimated to be average because of their moderate <br /> water solubility, and <br /> • For total designated level calculations, the lower (more conservative) value for the <br /> LF was used <br /> ► Despite the use of conservative assumptions in the DLM evaluation, the residual TPH in soils <br /> does not exceed the total or soluble designated levels <br /> ► Based on this DLM evaluation, none of the reported site constituents present in soils present <br /> a potential to impact groundwater <br />. Groundwater Chemistry <br /> • No detections for TPH-d or BTXE were reported for DMW-1, DMW-2, DMW-3, <br /> or the newly installed DMW-5, <br /> • A reported detection of 0 18 mg/1 TPH-d in DMW-4 on 5/2195 was resampled on <br /> 5/26/95, and re-analysis of the groundwater sample reported a non-detectable <br /> concentration of TPH-d (c 0 05 mg/1), <br /> • Analysis of a groundwater sample from DMW-5 for volatile halogenated <br /> hydrocarbons reported detections of carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane varying from 0 00065 to 0 04 mg/l, <br /> No. Given the number of potential off-site sources of volatile halogenated organic compounds in <br /> the vicinity of the site, off-site sources of these constituents should be evaluated <br /> Groundwater Level <br /> • Despite record precipitation levels in the Stockton area in 1994/95, groundwater <br /> levels only rose from approximately 61 feet bgs (5/94) to 56 feet bgs (5/95), still 20 <br /> feet below the high groundwater level mark of 35 feet bgs in 1987, <br /> ► Recent above-average precipitation in 1992/93 and 1994/95 has not compensated for the <br /> groundwater overdraft <br /> SAC156 14 14 <br /> DAMES &MOORE <br />