Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> • further define that lateral extent of groundwater contamination beneath the site The wells were <br /> subsequently developed and sampled on November 4, 2002 The installation, development, and <br /> sampling of wells MW5, MW6, and MW7 are summarized in the January 8, 2003 Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Report prepared by Ground Zero <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> I <br /> An experienced Ground Zero field technician monitored and sampled wells MWl through MW7 on <br /> December 5, 2002 Groundwater elevations were calculated by measuring the depth to <br /> groundwater in each well and subtracting the measured value from the respective wellhead <br /> elevation The depth to groundwater in the wells ranged from 7 12 feet below the top of the well <br /> casing (btoc) in well MW6 to 9 74 feet btoc in well MW1 Groundwater elevations fell an average <br /> of 103 feet between November 4, 2002 and December 5, 2002 Groundwater elevations fell an <br /> average of 1 83 feet between September 4, 2002 and December 5, 2002 <br /> Groundwater generally flowed west-northwest with an average gradient of 0 0014 ft/ft, or <br /> approximately 7 5 feet per mile A potentiometric surface map for December 5, 2002 is presented <br /> on Figure 2 Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 1 Monitoring data sheets are <br /> included in Attachment A <br /> At least three well casing volumes of water were purged from monitoring wells MW1 through <br /> MW7 prior to sampling Temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity were measured in <br /> • groundwater during the purging process Samples were collected after the measured parameters <br /> stabilized and water levels recovered to at least 80% of pre-purged levels Purged groundwater was <br /> contained in appropriately labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drums, which are stored onsite pending <br /> disposal Purge logs are included in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater samples were delivered under chain of custody protocol to Argon Laboratories <br /> (ELAP #2359) Samples were analyzed for the presence of BTEX, 1,2-DCA, EDB, and <br /> oxygenated gasoline additives using EPA method 8260B <br /> 2.3 Waste Soil Pile Sampling <br /> Two soil samples were collected from the stockpiled soil to determine if any residual <br /> hydrocarbons remain The samples were collected approximately six inches below the surface <br /> at locations that previously contained low levels of residual petroleum hydrocarbons The <br /> samples were transported to Argon Laboratories under chain of custody where they were <br /> composited into one sample and analyzed for the presence of TPHd, and TPHg by EPA <br /> Method 8015M, and for BTEX by EPA Method 8020 <br /> 3.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> No BTEX constituents were present above the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in <br /> . any site well Methyl-tert butyl ether (MTBE) was the only chemical of concern detected at <br /> the site MTBE was detected in wells MW 1, MW3, MW4, and MW5 at 8 9 parts per billion <br /> G 1Data1GROL)NDZE\Barnyard-Manser\Reports\QMR14QM2002 doe <br />