My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2040
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506560
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2020 8:27:10 AM
Creation date
6/22/2020 8:11:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0506560
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004535
FACILITY_NAME
CAL-FARM SUPPLY
STREET_NUMBER
2040
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14503004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2040 W WASHINGTON
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TATE OF CALIFORNIA - Environmental Proted&gency PETE WILSON, Governor <br /> _ a <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION _. <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916) 255-3000 <br /> FAX: (916) 255-3015 53 <br /> 3 April 1995 <br /> Ms. Catherine Whitworth <br /> Trustee, Cal Farm Supply <br /> P.O. Box 280 <br /> Davis, CA 95617 <br /> SUMMARY OF MEETING, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS <br /> Thank you for meeting with me last week to discuss the status of the former Cal Farm Supply <br /> facility on West Washington Street in Stockton. This letter summarizes our main points of <br /> discussion and should provide general information about the additional work that will be required at <br /> the site. <br /> In the past, staff from three different units within two different agencies have been overseeing the <br /> cleanup. In an effort to reduce duplication, I have talked to Diane Hinson of San Joaquin County <br /> Public Health, and Beth Thayer of the Regional Board. We have agreed that I will be the lead staff <br /> person working on this site, and will oversee both the pesticide and underground tank cleanups. <br /> An additional round of groundwater sampling should be completed this month. Because you are <br /> between consultants, Regional Board staff will collect the samples and submit them for analysis at <br /> our laboratory. The sampling is scheduled for April 17, 18, and if needed, April 19. Please <br /> contact me to make arrangements for staff to gain access to the site, for the guard dogs to be locked <br /> up, and for obtaining the keys to the monitoring wells. <br /> Last week, I gave you the telephone number for the State Water Resources Control Board's <br /> Petroleum UGT Cleanup Fund (916-227-4307). This fund reimburses qualified applicants for costs <br /> directly associated with assessment and/or remediation activities which exceed a total of $5,000 to <br /> $10,000 (depending on the responsible party's filing status). An application package for the <br /> Cleanup Fund is enclosed. <br /> You asked what the cleanup levels for the petroleum products in the groundwater would be. <br /> According to the Board's Underground Tank Unit, benzene needs to be cleaned up to less than <br /> 0.001 mg/1, and TPH-diesel to less than 0.1 mg/1. When these two target chemicals meet their <br /> respective cleanup levels, then the other petroleum products should also be below levels of concern. <br /> For the pesticides, each chemical should be cleaned up to less than its appropriate water quality <br /> criteria, as follows: dinoseb below 7.0 µg/1, MCPA below 11 µg/1, atrazine below 0.2 µg11, alpha- <br /> BHC below 0.01 µg/l, beta-BHC below 0.02 µg/l, and gamma-BHC below 0.03 µg/1. <br /> Once we have the results of the April 1995 sampling, we should have a good idea of the magnitude <br /> of the contamination. At this point, it appears that there are two separate pesticide plumes and one <br /> petroleum plume in the groundwater beneath the site. It is almost certain that the pesticides <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.