Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Arnold Hof -2 - 30 April 2003 <br /> needed for these constituents. The applicable water quality limits are discussed below and for <br /> your convenience are summarized in attached Table 1. <br /> The results of the monitoring events of 2002 confirm the following: <br /> • Ammonium is detected in three monitoring wells at concentrations of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/1 which <br /> are below the water quality limit of 1.5 mg/l (taste and odor threshold). <br /> • Triazine pesticides were last detected in 1997, but were not detected in any subsequent <br /> monitoring events (1998, 1999, and 2002). <br /> • Prior to 2000, chlorinated herbicides were only routinely detected in MW-3, but were not <br /> detected in 2002. In 1999, MW-3 contained the chlorinated herbicide 2,4,5-TP at 0.5 ug/1, <br /> which is below the water quality limit of 50 ug/l (California Primary Maximum Contaminant <br /> Level), and contained dinoseb at about 4 ug/l,which is below the water quality limit of 7 ug/l <br /> (California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level). Chlorinated herbicides were not <br /> detected in 2002. <br /> • In 2002,monitoring well MW-3 contained beta-benzene hexachloride (b-BHC) at 0.1 ug/l, <br /> which is above the water quality limit of 0.025 ug/1 and above the detection limit of 0.05 ug/1. <br /> MW-3 has not contained any other organochlorine compounds in any monitoring events since <br /> 1990 (1994, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2002). <br /> • In 2002,MW-1 contained petroleum constituents and the fuel oxygenate MTBE at <br /> concentrations greater than the water quality limits, and MW-5 contained MTBE. Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates were not detected in any other wells. <br /> We concur with your request to remove ammonium, triazine pesticides, and chlorinated <br /> herbicides from the MRP, although we may request that you resample for these constituents <br /> before we evaluate a request for a No Further Action designation. We also concur that <br /> monitoring for petroleum compounds should continue in MW-1, and monitoring for MTBE <br /> should continue in MW-1 and MW-5,but may be discontinued in MW-8. When petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons are no longer above the water quality objectives in MW-1,you should request No <br /> Further Action for the underground fuel tank portion of the investigation. The organochlorine <br /> compound b-BHC should continue to be included in the analytical schedule for MW-3. <br /> The results of the 2002 sampling events show that it is appropriate to reduce the monitoring <br /> frequency for all constituents to annually, as we had discussed in our 31 October 2001 meeting. <br /> The data confirm that annual sampling should occur in the third quarter,July through September, <br /> since constituents are typically at greatest concentrations during that quarter. <br /> The above changes are incorporated into the draft MRP, which is enclosed for your review and <br /> comment. <br /> Redundant Monitoring Wells <br /> Two of the monitoring wells are upgradient of the former Cal Farm Supply facility. Monitoring <br /> well MW-9 is about 75 feet upgradient, and MW-4 is on your upgradient property boundary. <br /> Monitoring well MW-9 is redundant, may be removed from the analytical monitoring schedule, <br /> and should be destroyed according to San Joaquin County Public Health Services regulations. In <br />