My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2040
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506560
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2020 8:33:00 AM
Creation date
6/22/2020 8:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0506560
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004535
FACILITY_NAME
CAL-FARM SUPPLY
STREET_NUMBER
2040
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14503004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2040 W WASHINGTON
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' All drilling equipment will be cleaned prior to arrival at the site. To avoid cross-contamination, <br /> all appropriate downhole drilling and sampling equipment will be cleaned between borings. <br /> ' Drill cuttings and groundwater generated from the investigation will be contained in United <br /> Nations approved 55-gallon drums and temporarily stored on site, pending laboratory analysis to <br /> ' determine disposal alternatives. <br /> ' 2.1.4 Well MW-5 Repair <br /> Monitoring well MW-5 will be repaired and raised approximately 18-inches. A slip union will <br /> ' be used to extend the rim of the well casing above any standing water. The surface seal will be <br /> rebuilt to include a stovepipe protective covering. <br /> ' 2.2 Remedial Options Feasibility Study <br /> ' The remedial options feasibility study (FS)will follow the general guidelines required by <br /> CERCLA. The first phase of the FS includes the development of remediation alternatives by: <br /> ' 1. Developing remedial action objectives by specifying the contaminants and media <br /> of interest, exposure pathways, and preliminary remediation goals. <br /> 1 <br /> 2. Developing general response actions for each media of interest that may be taken <br /> ' to satisfy the remedial action objectives for the site. <br /> ' 3. Identifying volumes or areas of media to which general response actions might be <br /> applied. <br /> ' 4. Identifying and screening the technologies applicable to each general response <br /> ' action to eliminate those that cannot be implemented technically at the site. <br /> ' 5. Identifying and evaluating technology process options to select a representative <br /> process for each technology type retained for consideration. <br /> ' 6. Assembling the selected representative technologies into alternatives representing <br /> a range of treatment and containment options. <br /> ' 9 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.